evidoria

What works in Bosnia and Herzegovina

All catalogues

18
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 15 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina has implemented several initiatives to address skills gaps and equality across sectors. IT Girls has reached over 500 students and trained 70 teachers across 29 schools in coding, robotics, and digital design to close the gender gap in tech, while CARE's Young Men Initiative achieved an increase from 42% to 67% of students disagreeing with violence-justifying statements through compulsory school curricula. The country's High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council became Europe's first public institution certified with UNDP's Gender Equality Seal, meeting 30 of 40 indicators. SME digitalisation programmes have supported over 200 firms, with broader regional expansion planned.

Drawn from: IT Girls – Digital Skills Initiative for Women and Girls (Bosnia and Herzegovina) · Young Men Initiative (YMI) — CARE Balkans' School-Based Community Mobilisation Against Gender-Based Violence · ISOC Bosnia and Herzegovina's Barrier-Free Internet Programme for Blind Users · HJPC BiH's UNDP Gender Equality Seal — First Public Institution in Europe Certified (2020-2024) · Go Digital in the Western Balkans — EBRD-EU SME Digitalisation Loan-and-Grant Programme · Akelius Digital Language Course in Bosnia and Herzegovina — Blended English/German Learning for Refugee and Migrant Children · WeMapp — Crowdsourced Accessibility Mapping and Personalised Routing for People with Motor Disabilities in Sarajevo · Status and Reparations for Civilian Survivors of Wartime Sexual Violence — Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Teacher capability & pedagogy +62 pts 100 here · 38 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 83 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Scalability & sustainability -10 pts 52 here · 62 average

Evaluated outcomes -11 pts 67 here · 78 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -22 pts 42 here · 64 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Score profile vs peers

Teacher capability & pedagogy
100 · 38
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Curator validation
100 · 73
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Sustainability (ongoing)
85 · 78
Transferability / replicability
63 · 60
Transparency, fairness & accountability
56 · 54
Documented learning
75 · 74
Effectiveness
67 · 66
Evidence of impact / measured public value
57 · 57
Demonstrated reach
75 · 76
Innovation level
57 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Scalability & sustainability
52 · 62
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 78
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Governance, capability & sustainability
42 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Efficiency
0 · 32
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 48

Coloured bar: Bosnia and Herzegovina. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

IT Girls – Digital Skills Initiative for Women and Girls (Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 92

Young Men Initiative (YMI) — CARE Balkans' School-Based Community Mobilisation Against Gender-Based Violence · 89

ISOC Bosnia and Herzegovina's Barrier-Free Internet Programme for Blind Users · 88

HJPC BiH's UNDP Gender Equality Seal — First Public Institution in Europe Certified (2020-2024) · 85

Go Digital in the Western Balkans — EBRD-EU SME Digitalisation Loan-and-Grant Programme · 76

Akelius Digital Language Course in Bosnia and Herzegovina — Blended English/German Learning for Refugee and Migrant Children · 72

WeMapp — Crowdsourced Accessibility Mapping and Personalised Routing for People with Motor Disabilities in Sarajevo · 72

Status and Reparations for Civilian Survivors of Wartime Sexual Violence — Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina · 63

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Bosnia and Herzegovina concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more