What works in Tripoli
All catalogues · Libya profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Tripoli
Maharah Coding School delivered 148 hours of coding training in Tripoli as part of a three-city initiative that produced 142 graduates by March 2024. UNHCR's biometric registration system registered 47,701 refugees and asylum seekers in Tripoli by June 2026, representing 42% of the total registered population across Libya, with Sudanese nationals accounting for over 83% of those registrants. The evidence demonstrates Tripoli's role as both a hub for youth skills development and refugee protection services, though the practices do not quantify broader economic or social outcomes in the city.
Drawn from: Maharah Coding School · WFP's SCOPE Platform Doubles Cash Assistance to Vulnerable Families in Libya · UNHCR's Biometric Registration Reaches 113,000 Refugees in Libya Amid Political Backlash · Libya's Women's Parliamentary Quota Rollback — From 30% to 16% (Law No. 2 of 2021)
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +9 pts 67 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Sustainability -28 pts 50 here · 78 average
Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average
Scalability beyond pilot -46 pts 17 here · 62 average
Governance, capability & sustainability -47 pts 17 here · 64 average
Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average
Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average
Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average
Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average
Achievement / evidence -88 pts 0 here · 88 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Tripoli. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
WFP's SCOPE Platform Doubles Cash Assistance to Vulnerable Families in Libya · 53
UNHCR's Biometric Registration Reaches 113,000 Refugees in Libya Amid Political Backlash · 40
Libya's Women's Parliamentary Quota Rollback — From 30% to 16% (Law No. 2 of 2021) · 15
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more