evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

UNHCR's Biometric Registration Reaches 113,000 Refugees in Libya Amid Political Backlash

Libya · Tripoli · See the Libya profile · See the Tripoli profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 83% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

UNHCR's biometric registration system grew from 56,687 refugees in Libya at end-2023 to 113,026 by June 2026, even as Libyan authorities restricted access, blocked its Tripoli office and called for its expulsion over those same registrations.

113,026
Refugees/asylum seekers registered (1 June 2026)
79,019
Registered by end-2024 (end-2024)
40 %
Year-on-year increase, end-2023 to end-2024
~30,800 of an estimated 228,800
Sudanese arrivals in 2024 registered (2024)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
Period
2018–2026
Keywords
refugee protection, biometric identity, migration

Context

Libya hosts a large population of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants alongside an even larger unregistered population, and has no single unified central government able to grant UNHCR consistent access to the people it is trying to identify and protect. UNHCR uses its global Biometric Identity Management System (BIMS) to register refugees and asylum seekers in Libya, operating primarily out of Tripoli.

Activities

Its own published registration dashboards show steady growth: 56,687 registered by end-2023, 79,019 by end-2024 (a 40% increase, with 36,159 new registrations that year), 88,283 by April 2025, 110,908 by April 2026, and 113,026 (48,959 cases) by 1 June 2026.

Results

Sudanese nationals account for over 83% of registrants, and Tripoli alone hosts 47,701 people, or 42% of the total. UNHCR has been explicit that registration captures only a fraction of new arrivals: of an estimated 228,800 Sudanese who arrived in Libya in 2024 alone, only about 30,800 were registered that year.

Conclusions

The programme's growth is well documented through UNHCR's own regularly published dashboards, corroborated independently by Human Rights Watch. But the same registrations have become a direct source of political conflict: as early as 2018, UNHCR's Special Envoy Vincent Cochetel said Libyan authorities were 'opposed to us providing proper documentation.' In June 2026, Libya's House of Representatives issued a statement rejecting migrant settlement, a Tripoli city council accused UNHCR of 'undermining national security' and called for its expulsion, and protesters blockaded UNHCR's Tripoli headquarters. The case illustrates both the scale a biometric registration system can reach and how fragile its sustainability is when the host state actively contests its legitimacy.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Global UNHCR biometric infrastructure; no country-specific cost figure published.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Registrations tracked from end-2023 through June 2026; political contestation of the programme documented from 2018 through 2026.
Staffing & skills
UNHCR Libya operation

Conditions for success

  • Global, standardised biometric infrastructure (BIMS) reused across UNHCR operations

Common failure modes

  • Libyan authorities have repeatedly restricted access, calling the registration centre 'out of reach'
  • June 2026: Libya's House of Representatives rejected migrant settlement, a Tripoli city council called for UNHCR's expulsion, and protesters blockaded UNHCR's Tripoli headquarters
  • Registration captures only a fraction of new arrivals (e.g. ~30,800 of an estimated 228,800 Sudanese arrivals registered in 2024)

Where it fits

Governance type
UN agency operating without a unified host government
Scale
national (Libya), concentrated in Tripoli
Income level
fragile/conflict-affected state

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful