What works in Libya
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Libya
Libya's evidence base reflects fragmented interventions across humanitarian assistance, skills development, and entrepreneurship, with limited integration into national systems. WFP's cash-assistance platform doubled disbursements to reach 46,000 people in 2023, while UNHCR's biometric registration grew to 113,026 refugees by June 2026 despite political resistance, and 142 young Libyans completed coding training across three cities. However, the practices demonstrate no quantified data on longer-term outcomes, economic integration, or sustainability—EU-funded startup incubators depend entirely on external funding rather than indigenous institutions, and no follow-on survival rates or private investment figures are published.
Drawn from: Maharah Coding School · WFP's SCOPE Platform Doubles Cash Assistance to Vulnerable Families in Libya · Asarya Business Incubator & Silphium Labs — EU-Funded Startup Recovery Incubators in Post-Conflict Libya · UNHCR's Biometric Registration Reaches 113,000 Refugees in Libya Amid Political Backlash · Ubari Lakes Basin Integrated Land & Water Management — Restoring Libya's Sahara Oasis Wetlands · Libya's Women's Parliamentary Quota Rollback — From 30% to 16% (Law No. 2 of 2021) · ChatGPT Adoption and Integrity Concerns in Libyan Higher Education — Two Independent University Surveys
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average
Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +10 pts 67 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average
Innovation level -15 pts 47 here · 62 average
Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average
Governance, capability & sustainability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average
Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average
Sustainability -34 pts 44 here · 78 average
Scalability & sustainability -45 pts 17 here · 62 average
Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average
Equity & inclusion -50 pts 0 here · 50 average
Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average
Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average
Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average
Achievement / evidence -87 pts 0 here · 87 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Libya. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
WFP's SCOPE Platform Doubles Cash Assistance to Vulnerable Families in Libya · 53
UNHCR's Biometric Registration Reaches 113,000 Refugees in Libya Amid Political Backlash · 40
Ubari Lakes Basin Integrated Land & Water Management — Restoring Libya's Sahara Oasis Wetlands · 33
Libya's Women's Parliamentary Quota Rollback — From 30% to 16% (Law No. 2 of 2021) · 15
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Libya concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more