What works in Leuven
All catalogues · Belgium profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Leuven
Leuven 2030 shows Leuven as a climate-focused city steered by a quadruple-helix partnership that grew from 60 founding members to over 600 partners, winning the €1 million European Capital of Innovation award in 2020. The city's 'Leuven Helps' platform, adopted by approximately 280 cities worldwide, demonstrates its influence on municipal climate governance models. KU Leuven Research & Development and imec reveal Leuven's role as an innovation hub: the university's tech-transfer office has created 199 spin-offs employing 7,700+ people and generated €152.6 million in licence income in 2025, while imec (a KU Leuven spin-off itself) became Belgium's top European Patent Office filer in 2023–2024. The evidence quantifies Leuven's climate governance scale and research commercialisation performance, though it does not measure broader societal or economic impacts on the wider region.
Drawn from: Leuven 2030 — quadruple-helix climate-neutral city experiment · KU Leuven Research & Development — Europe's Longest-Running University Tech-Transfer Office · KU Leuven Research & Development (LRD) — University Spin-off & Technology Transfer Office · imec · StreetSmart - Case Management Tool for Non-formal Education in Youth Work · Able to Include
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evidence of impact / measured results +34 pts 92 here · 57 average
Innovation level +31 pts 93 here · 62 average
Scalability +30 pts 92 here · 62 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +18 pts 92 here · 74 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication +15 pts 75 here · 60 average
Weaknesses
Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average
Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average
Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Leuven. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Leuven 2030 — quadruple-helix climate-neutral city experiment · 91
KU Leuven Research & Development — Europe's Longest-Running University Tech-Transfer Office · 86
KU Leuven Research & Development (LRD) — University Spin-off & Technology Transfer Office · 81
imec · 76
StreetSmart - Case Management Tool for Non-formal Education in Youth Work · 56
Able to Include · 36
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more