evidoria

What works in Montenegro

All catalogues

7
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Montenegro

Montenegro has implemented several gender equality and digital education initiatives with documented results. [Women's Political Network advocacy contributed to women's parliamentary representation rising from 11% to 24% nationally and from 8% to 26% locally between 2017–2021], while [a joint UNICEF–UNESCO–ILO programme trained 170 ICT coordinators and 300+ teachers, reaching over 6,000 students with explicit equity targets including a 48% girls quota]. [An AI literacy pilot using micro:bit reached 1,266 students across 23 schools, with 83% creating something new and 90% reporting enjoyment of lessons], and [Oracle Academy access was extended to approximately 220 schools and universities and 4,000 students through a four-year curriculum partnership]. However, the practices document curriculum access and advocacy outcomes rather than independently verified learning gains or long-term impact on labour-market readiness.

Drawn from: Women's Political Network (WPN) Montenegro · Digital, Inclusive and Transformative: Quality Education for Montenegro · AI Literacy Pilot with micro:bit — UNICEF and Montenegro's Bureau for Education · Third Oracle Academy Agreement Brings AI Curriculum to 220 Montenegrin Schools and Universities · Strengthening Montenegro's Protected-Area System and the Creation of Prokletije National Park · Innovation Fund of Montenegro — National Grant Financing for Startups and SME Innovation · Electronic Court Practice System — Montenegro's First AI Tool in the National Judiciary

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +49 pts 100 here · 51 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 37 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Evidence of learning impact -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Transferability / replicability -15 pts 44 here · 59 average

Innovation level -16 pts 47 here · 63 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -31 pts 17 here · 48 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -34 pts 44 here · 78 average

Inclusiveness / equity -42 pts 0 here · 42 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 51
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 37
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Equity & inclusion
50 · 52
Scalability beyond pilot
58 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 28
Transferability / replicability
44 · 59
Innovation level
47 · 63
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
17 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Sustainability (ongoing)
44 · 78
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 42
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: Montenegro. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Women's Political Network (WPN) Montenegro · 85

Digital, Inclusive and Transformative: Quality Education for Montenegro · 72

AI Literacy Pilot with micro:bit — UNICEF and Montenegro's Bureau for Education · 53

Third Oracle Academy Agreement Brings AI Curriculum to 220 Montenegrin Schools and Universities · 40

Strengthening Montenegro's Protected-Area System and the Creation of Prokletije National Park · 40

Innovation Fund of Montenegro — National Grant Financing for Startups and SME Innovation · 38

Electronic Court Practice System — Montenegro's First AI Tool in the National Judiciary · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Montenegro concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more