evidoria

What works in Montenegro

All catalogues

9
evaluated practices
47/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 7 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Montenegro

Montenegro has made significant progress in gender representation in politics through cross-party coalition advocacy, with women in national parliament rising from 11% to 24% and in local parliaments from 8% to 26% between 2017–2021. The country is expanding digital access and AI literacy across its education system through multiple initiatives: a joint UNICEF–UNESCO–ILO programme has trained 170 ICT coordinators and reached over 6,000 students across 102 schools, while a micro:bit pilot engaged 1,266 students (83% of whom created something new), and Oracle Academy partnerships now provide AI and technology curricula to 220 institutions and approximately 4,000 students. However, these initiatives are primarily documented through reach metrics and participant satisfaction rather than independent measurement of learning or policy outcomes; for instance, the 40% electoral quota remains a legislative proposal rather than enacted law.

Drawn from: Women's Political Network (WPN) Montenegro · Digital, Inclusive and Transformative: Quality Education for Montenegro · AI Literacy Pilot with micro:bit — UNICEF and Montenegro's Bureau for Education · Third Oracle Academy Agreement Brings AI Curriculum to 220 Montenegrin Schools and Universities · Strengthening Montenegro's Protected-Area System and the Creation of Prokletije National Park · Innovation Fund of Montenegro — National Grant Financing for Startups and SME Innovation · Piloting Gender-Responsive Budgeting in Montenegro's Agriculture Sector · Electronic Court Practice System — Montenegro's First AI Tool in the National Judiciary

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Innovation level -15 pts 47 here · 62 average

Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Effectiveness -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Transferability / replicability -18 pts 42 here · 60 average

Impact on gender equality -20 pts 50 here · 70 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -25 pts 22 here · 47 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Evaluated outcomes -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -45 pts 33 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 38
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 26
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Scalability beyond pilot
53 · 62
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Innovation level
47 · 62
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Effectiveness
50 · 66
Transferability / replicability
42 · 60
Impact on gender equality
50 · 70
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 57
Transparency, ethics & data protection
22 · 47
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 32
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 43
Sustainability (ongoing)
33 · 78

Coloured bar: Montenegro. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Women's Political Network (WPN) Montenegro · 85

Digital, Inclusive and Transformative: Quality Education for Montenegro · 72

AI Literacy Pilot with micro:bit — UNICEF and Montenegro's Bureau for Education · 53

Third Oracle Academy Agreement Brings AI Curriculum to 220 Montenegrin Schools and Universities · 40

Strengthening Montenegro's Protected-Area System and the Creation of Prokletije National Park · 40

Innovation Fund of Montenegro — National Grant Financing for Startups and SME Innovation · 38

Piloting Gender-Responsive Budgeting in Montenegro's Agriculture Sector · 37

Electronic Court Practice System — Montenegro's First AI Tool in the National Judiciary · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Montenegro concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more