evidoria

What works in Podgorica

All catalogues · Montenegro profile

7
evaluated practices
44/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Transferability / replicability -18 pts 42 here · 60 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Impact on gender equality -21 pts 50 here · 71 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -25 pts 22 here · 47 average

Innovation -29 pts 33 here · 62 average

Evaluated outcomes -29 pts 50 here · 79 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Sustainability -34 pts 44 here · 78 average

Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 73
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 37
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 26
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Scalability beyond pilot
53 · 62
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Transferability / replicability
42 · 60
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Impact on gender equality
50 · 71
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 57
Transparency, ethics & data protection
22 · 47
Innovation
33 · 62
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 79
Efficiency
0 · 33
Sustainability
44 · 78
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 43

Coloured bar: Podgorica. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Women's Political Network (WPN) Montenegro · 85

AI Literacy Pilot with micro:bit — UNICEF and Montenegro's Bureau for Education · 53

Third Oracle Academy Agreement Brings AI Curriculum to 220 Montenegrin Schools and Universities · 40

Innovation Fund of Montenegro — National Grant Financing for Startups and SME Innovation · 38

Piloting Gender-Responsive Budgeting in Montenegro's Agriculture Sector · 37

Electronic Court Practice System — Montenegro's First AI Tool in the National Judiciary · 33

NCC Montenegro x MAIA — A National HPC Centre and AI Association Partner on AI Skills Training · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more