evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

AI Scenarios 2030 — UK Government Office for Science's Cross-Government Foresight Tool for AI Policy Stress-Testing

United Kingdom · London · See the United Kingdom profile

The UK Government Office for Science built five structured AI Scenarios 2030 — derived from six critical uncertainties through expert workshops and morphological analysis — that departments across Whitehall use to stress-test policies against different possible AI futures.

AI Scenarios 2030 — UK Government Office for Science's Cross-Government Foresight Tool for AI Policy Stress-Testing

Details

Promoter
Government Office for Science (GO-Science), with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the AI Security Institute (AISI)
Period
April 2025–present (refreshed June 2026)
Keywords
strategic foresight, AI policy stress-testing, scenario planning, cross-government coordination

Context

In April 2025, the UK's Government Office for Science (GO-Science) published AI Scenarios 2030, a foresight report built together with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the AI Security Institute (AISI) to help policymakers across Whitehall reason about a highly uncertain AI future.

Objectives

Rather than forecasts, the scenarios are explicitly designed as stress-testing tools so departments can check whether existing policies and plans hold up under different AI trajectories; GO-Science positions them as 'a shared baseline for cross-government thinking on the future of AI.'

Activities

The team used a hybrid methodology of expert workshops, peer review and a General Morphological Analysis of six critical uncertainties (AI capability growth, model distribution and access, security and controllability, adoption and autonomy, labour-market displacement, and international cooperation) to build five internally consistent scenarios: Slow Burn, Open Frontier, Augmented Growth, Transformation Economy and Take-Off. The scenarios were refreshed in June 2026 and published under the Open Government Licence as part of the wider 'Frontier AI: Capabilities and Risks' series.

Results

GOV.UK states the scenarios 'have been used across government to stress test policies' and are 'in regular demand,' though this is institutional testimony rather than a quantified outcome measure.

Conclusions

The approach is qualitative by design: its value lies in structuring debate and surfacing blind spots rather than producing a single quantified forecast, so its evidence base rests on institutionalisation and repeated reuse across departments rather than a performance metric.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful