evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Big Local — Resident-Led, Long-Term Neighbourhood Endowments in England

United Kingdom · London · See the United Kingdom profile · See the London profile

Top 76% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

England's Big Local gave 150 deprived neighbourhoods roughly £1 million each in resident-controlled endowments; a peer-reviewed NIHR evaluation found a real fall in burglary but no lasting wellbeing gain, with benefits unevenly distributed.

Big Local — Resident-Led, Long-Term Neighbourhood Endowments in England

Details

Promoter
Local Trust
Period
2012–2026
Keywords
community development, neighbourhood governance, place-based funding

Description

Big Local is run by Local Trust, an independent charity established in 2012 with an endowment from the National Lottery Community Fund (then the Big Lottery Fund). In each of 150 selected deprived English neighbourhoods, a resident-led partnership decides autonomously how to spend a long-term endowment — nominally £1 million, part of a total commitment of about £270 million across the programme — on locally chosen priorities such as jobs and skills, green space, community buildings and activities for young people, over a 10–15 year period running from 2012 to 2026.
By spend, the 150 areas drew down £180.4 million through 1,524 individual grants, with community spaces (£21.9 million), local grant schemes (£7.4 million) and skills/employment projects (£5.9 million) among the largest categories, according to Local Trust's own published programme-level spend data. A 2023 mixed-methods evaluation published in NIHR's Public Health Research journal, led by researchers at Lancaster University, found a statistically significant reduction in burglary (z-score change of -0.054) but no significant population-level improvement in anxiety overall; a modelled cost-benefit analysis produced a central estimate of £959 million in net benefit over four years, but a conservative scenario put it as low as £64 million.
The same evaluation found that wellbeing gains among the most engaged residents were not sustained by 2020, and that benefits were unevenly distributed — favouring more-educated and male residents. Local Trust's own legacy research has also documented governance strain within some resident partnerships, describing "personalities, power struggles" as undermining collective decision-making in a minority of areas.

Read the full analysis: https://localtrust.org.uk

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful