evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Canada's Federal AI Register — 409 Systems Disclosed, but Only 4% With Public Impact Assessments

Canada · Ottawa · See the Canada profile · See the Ottawa profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 46% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

On 28 November 2025 Canada published its first federal AI Register, listing 409 systems across 42 institutions. An independent review found only 4% of examined tools had public impact assessments and 86% served internal operations, not citizens.

409
AI systems disclosed (across 42 institutions)
4% of 303 examined
Automated tools with public impact assessments
86%
Systems serving internal operations (not citizen-facing)
Canada's Federal AI Register — 409 Systems Disclosed, but Only 4% With Public Impact Assessments

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Period
2025–ongoing
Keywords
public sector, digital government, AI governance, transparency, federal government

Context

On 28 November 2025, Canada's Treasury Board published the Government of Canada AI Register, the country's first public inventory of federal AI use, listing 409 AI systems across 42 federal institutions, drawing on data validated by departments.

Activities

Each entry records a system's purpose, intended use, and whether it was built in-house or by a vendor, with a companion open-data release for researchers; the government describes this first release as a minimum viable product, with public consultations planned for 2026.

Results

An independent academic analysis published shortly after launch found only 4% of 303 automated tools it examined had a publicly available Algorithmic Impact Assessment, despite that being formally required under Canada's 2019 Directive on Automated Decision-Making; the same analysis found 86% of listed systems serve internal government operations rather than citizen-facing services, and a single vendor (Microsoft) accounts for 46 of the listed systems.

Conclusions

The register and its independent critique together illustrate both the value and the limits of self-reported federal AI inventories: 409 systems is a genuinely large disclosure by international standards, but the gap between the register's existence and the underlying Directive's impact-assessment requirement shows disclosure alone does not guarantee accountability.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Conditions for success

  • Department-validated data feeding a public open-data release
  • Planned 2026 public consultation to refine scope

Common failure modes

  • Only 4% of examined tools had a public impact assessment despite a 2019 legal requirement; at least one high-scrutiny system (IRCC's Chinook tool) was omitted

Commonly funded by

Digital Europe Programme

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful