evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Clasificador Orientador del Gasto en Políticas de Igualdad — Ecuador's National Gender-Responsive Budget Classifier

Ecuador · Quito · See the Ecuador profile · See the Quito profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 56% 63/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Ecuador has run a mandatory national gender-budget classifier since 2010–2012, won the 2013 UN Public Service Award for it, and proposed ~$772M for gender-equality spending in 2024 — though peer-reviewed research finds uneven follow-through across ministries.

772.44 USD million
Proposed 2024 gender-equality policy spending (2024)
13 USD million
Ministry of Women and Human Rights budget (2024)
Clasificador Orientador del Gasto en Políticas de Igualdad — Ecuador's National Gender-Responsive Budget Classifier

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas del Ecuador (MEF)
Period
2007–ongoing
Keywords
public finance, gender equality, national government

Context

Ecuador began embedding a gender lens in its national budget in 2007; in 2012 the Ministry of Economy and Finance introduced the mandatory Clasificador Orientador del Gasto en Políticas de Igualdad, which every public-budget entity must use.

Activities

The reform, developed with UN Women and GIZ, requires institutions to tag activities against the National Women's Agenda and equality policy goals, alongside related classifiers for disability and other groups.

Results

Ecuador's 2024 draft budget proposed roughly $772.44 million for gender-equality policy spending; a 2024 peer-reviewed study found the classifier raised awareness and gave some agencies real leverage, but met sustained resistance elsewhere.

Conclusions

Ecuador shows a legally mandated, internationally awarded budget classifier can institutionalise gender analysis at scale, without guaranteeing every ministry uses it meaningfully.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Economy and Finance budget officers, UN Women/GIZ technical advisors

Conditions for success

  • legal/constitutional mandate
  • cross-ministry political buy-in

Common failure modes

  • sustained resistance from officials in other parts of government
  • uneven implementation across ministries

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful