evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Documenting the AI Divide — A Mixed-Methods Study of Student AI Adoption in Urban and Rural Nepal

Nepal · Kathmandu · See the Nepal profile · See the Kathmandu profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 100% 7/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Nepal Kasthamandap College researchers surveyed 150 students and interviewed 11 educators across urban and rural Nepal, finding 90.7% AI awareness but a stark urban-rural exposure gap (124/135 vs 12/15) and teachers who feel unprepared to integrate AI.

150 students
Students surveyed
135 students
Urban students surveyed
15 students
Rural students surveyed
11 interviews
Educator/expert interviews
90.7 %
Students reporting AI awareness
33.3 %
Weekly AI tool use
30 %
Daily AI tool use
124/135
Urban students with AI exposure
12/15
Rural students with AI exposure
62.7 %
Believe AI could reduce educational inequality
Documenting the AI Divide — A Mixed-Methods Study of Student AI Adoption in Urban and Rural Nepal

Details

Promoter
Nepal Kasthamandap College
Period
2025
Keywords
AI literacy, digital equity, secondary and higher education research

Context

AI adoption in Nepali schools and colleges is widely discussed but rarely measured. Researchers at Nepal Kasthamandap College set out to document how students actually use AI tools and how prepared teachers feel to integrate them, using stratified random sampling across urban and rural school and college settings.

Activities

The study combined a quantitative survey of 150 students (135 urban, 15 rural) with 11 in-depth interviews with teachers, administrators and AI experts, analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics alongside thematic analysis of the qualitative material.

Results

90.7% of students reported awareness of AI, and 33.3% used AI tools weekly while 30% used them daily. Exposure was sharply unequal: 124 of 135 urban students showed AI exposure versus 12 of 15 rural students, and male students reported slightly higher usage than female students. 62.7% of respondents believed AI could reduce educational inequality if access were broadened. In interviews, teachers and administrators pointed to infrastructure deficiencies, limited digital literacy and insufficient training as the main barriers to responsible AI integration in the classroom.

Conclusions

This is a single-institution, self-reported survey with no deployed intervention or before/after learning measure — it documents the state of informal AI adoption and the equity gap around it, not a programme whose learning impact has been evaluated.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Not disclosed; an academic survey/interview study rather than a funded intervention.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Conducted in 2025 as a single cross-sectional study.
Staffing & skills
Nepal Kasthamandap College research team

Conditions for success

  • Stratified random sampling across urban and rural settings to surface access gaps

Common failure modes

  • Sharp urban-rural exposure gap (124/135 vs 12/15)
  • Teachers report feeling unprepared to integrate AI due to infrastructure deficiencies, limited digital literacy and insufficient training
  • No deployed intervention — the study documents adoption, it does not evaluate a programme

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful