California Conservation and Mitigation Banking Program (USA)
United States of America
Since California's first conservation bank in 1995, CDFW has approved 97 banks covering about 73,948 acres (2024), generating 1,406.9 new …
South Korea · Seoul · See the South Korea profile · See the Seoul profile
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Since 2001 South Korea has charged developers a per-square-metre fee for ecosystem damage, funding 277 restoration projects by 2022 — though a 2024 academic review found scant evidence assessing whether restored sites actually recovered biodiversity.
Under South Korea's Natural Environment Conservation Act, developers whose projects damage a threshold area of natural ecosystems must pay an Ecosystem Conservation Cooperation Charge into a restoration fund administered by the Ministry of Environment. The charge, introduced in 2001, is calculated by multiplying the destroyed area by a per-square-metre rate (250 KRW/m² at introduction, since raised to 300 KRW/m²) and a regional ecological coefficient, capped at 5 billion KRW per project.
Revenue funds 'Ecosystem Conservation Charge Return Projects' (ECCRP) that restore damaged habitats, typically prioritising sites near existing source populations of target species. Guidelines revised in 2010 pushed project designers to specify target species explicitly; by the study period, 78.3% of projects did so, spanning 157 distinct species including 36 endangered ones.
Between 2003 and 2022, 277 ECCRP restoration projects were completed nationwide, rising from around 3 per year at the outset to roughly 30 per year by 2022. Gyeonggi province led with 67 projects (24.2% of the total) and the Han River Basin Environmental Office alone administered 105 (37.9%); 83 projects (30%) took place in wetlands, 69 (24.9%) in urban areas and 47 (17%) in forestry land.
A 2024 peer-reviewed study found 'a substantial lack of academic research assessing outcomes' and called for decade-long post-restoration monitoring. A separate valuation study found the statutory charge rate significantly undervalues real ecosystem-service worth (estimated at roughly 1,300-3,500 KRW/m² per year), suggesting the fee charged to developers may be too low to fully offset the biodiversity damage it is meant to compensate.
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United States of America
Since California's first conservation bank in 1995, CDFW has approved 97 banks covering about 73,948 acres (2024), generating 1,406.9 new …
Israel
Israel's largest landfill — 25 million tonnes dumped 1952–1998 — was capped and redesigned by architect Peter Latz into an …
Spain
EU LIFE-funded project mapped carbon stocks across 13,000+ ha of Andalusian Posidonia oceanica meadows and salt marshes (13,085 ktCO2 stored), …
Chile
Chile's environmental court approved a binding, up to US$93m agreement forcing the world's largest copper mine to fund 19 measures …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.