evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

eUprava's Disability-Led Accessibility Redesign — Slovenia's National Government Portal Rebuilt to WCAG 2.1

Slovenia · Ljubljana · See the Slovenia profile · See the Ljubljana profile

Top 86% 48/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Slovenia's Ministry of Digital Transformation rebuilt the national eUprava portal to WCAG 2.1, incorporating feedback from disability organisations, though no independent audit results have been published yet.

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Digital Transformation of the Republic of Slovenia
Period
Ongoing
Keywords
e-government, public sector, digital accessibility

Description

eUprava is Slovenia's national e-government portal, administered by the Ministry of Digital Transformation. The portal has been redesigned to conform to WCAG 2.1, aligning with Slovenia's Act on the Accessibility of Websites and Mobile Applications (ZDSMA), which transposes the EU Web Accessibility Directive.
Feedback from organisations representing persons with disabilities was incorporated into the redesign to address real user needs: screen-reader compatibility and keyboard navigation for blind and visually impaired users, support for deaf and hard-of-hearing users, and simplified forms and plain navigation for users with cognitive or reading difficulties. The Ministry also ran training sessions for public-sector employees on digital inclusion.
The Ministry's own accessibility statement and the European Commission's AccessibleEU centre both describe the features and the consultation process, but neither publishes independent audit scores, user-testing sample sizes, or before/after accessibility metrics, so the redesign's measurable impact cannot yet be independently verified.

Read the full analysis: https://e-uprava.gov.si/si/o-e-upravi/o-e-upravi/izjava-o-dostopnosti.html

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful