Italy's National AI-in-Schools Guidelines — From a 15-School Pilot to Ministerial Decree No. 166
Italy
Italy's education ministry piloted AI assistants in 15 schools across four regions from Sept 2024, tracked via INVALSI tests, trained …
Japan · Tokyo · See the Japan profile · See the Tokyo profile
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 96% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
On 7 April 2026 Japan's Cabinet approved full legal status for digital textbooks, equal to print, alongside a privacy-law amendment waiving individual consent for some student data used in AI development -- a pairing analysts flagged as a data-governance risk.
On 7 April 2026, Japan's Cabinet approved two linked bills: an amendment to the School Education Act that elevates digital textbooks from 'supplementary material' to full legal status as official textbooks — making them eligible for government screening, official adoption and free distribution on equal footing with paper textbooks — and an amendment to the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) that removes the requirement for opt-in consent before certain personal information, including student data, can be used for AI development classified as lower-risk 'statistical production.'
The School Education Act amendment takes effect in April 2027, with full classroom deployment expected from fiscal year 2030; local school boards will choose between print, digital or hybrid textbooks. The reform follows Japan's GIGA School programme, which has already deployed roughly 10.6 million student devices, with a reported JPY 266.1 billion budgeted for device renewal between FY2024 and FY2026; Japan's EdTech market is reported to have grown roughly 26-fold, from about JPY 3 billion in FY2019 to about JPY 80 billion in FY2025.
Independent policy analysis (Institute for Social Vision Design) and mainstream reporting (The Japan Times) both confirm the two measures were approved the same day, and raise two concerns: that the school choice between print, digital and hybrid formats risks entrenching regional inequality between better- and worse-resourced school boards, and that pairing textbook digitisation with a consent waiver for AI-training data use creates what the analysis calls a 'data governance vacuum,' in which parents have received little explanation of how their children's learning data may be used to train AI systems. This practice is included as a cautionary governance case: it documents a real, verifiable weakening of individual consent protections alongside a major expansion of digital-learning infrastructure, rather than an unambiguous success story.
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Italy
Italy's education ministry piloted AI assistants in 15 schools across four regions from Sept 2024, tracked via INVALSI tests, trained …
United Arab Emirates
Dubai's private-school regulator KHDA and the UAE's national PDPL framework now require age-staged, teacher-supervised AI access, mandatory Data Protection Impact …
Norway
Norway's government announced on 19 June 2026 that pupils aged 6-13 will be barred from using generative AI in school …
Egypt
UNESCO and Egypt's Ministry of Education launched a nationally contextualised AI competency framework for teachers on 3 June 2026, shaped …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.