evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Kampala Institutional and Infrastructure Development Project (KIIDP) — Roads, Drainage and Governance Reform

Uganda · Kampala · See the Uganda profile · See the Kampala profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 83% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

World Bank-financed KIIDP (2008-2021, $33.6M then $183.7M) gave 1.3M+ Kampala residents road access, beating its target -- but a drainage sub-project lost funding after unresolved resettlement, and an Inspection Panel complaint needed 18 months of mediation.

33.6 million USD
KIIDP phase 1 financing (SDR 22M IDA credit) (2008–2017)
183.7 million USD
KIIDP-2 phase 2 financing (2015–2021)
1,307,837 people
Residents gaining all-season road access (target: 1,048,000) (2008–2021)
1.18 billion USD
Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area vision, scaled-back cost (n/a)
566 million USD
World Bank contribution to GKMA vision (n/a)
571.31 million USD
Uganda government committed co-financing (largely unfulfilled) (n/a)
48 million USD
Institutional-strengthening grant intended for 9 authorities (n/a)
18 million USD
Amount central ministry allocated to itself from that grant (n/a)
Kampala Institutional and Infrastructure Development Project (KIIDP) — Roads, Drainage and Governance Reform

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA)
Period
2008-2021 (KIIDP 2008-2017; KIIDP-2 2015-2021)
Keywords
roads, drainage, institutional capacity, informal settlements, municipal governance

Context

Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) implemented two consecutive World Bank-financed programmes to rebuild urban infrastructure and institutional capacity across the city's five divisions. The first phase, the Kampala Institutional and Infrastructure Development Project (KIIDP), ran from roughly 2008 to 2017 with an SDR 22 million (about $33.6 million) IDA credit. A second phase, KIIDP-2, ran from 2015 to 2021 with a total value of $183.7 million. Combined, the programmes rebuilt roads and drainage, and modernised KCCA's property registers, road asset management, traffic management and revenue-collection systems.

Results

On its headline metric, the programme outperformed its target: 1,307,837 urban residents gained access to all-season roads within 500 metres of their homes, against an end-of-project target of 1,048,000. It formed part of a broader Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area vision, originally costed at $3 billion and later scaled back to $1.18 billion, with the World Bank contributing $566 million and the French Development Agency $42.66 million; Uganda's own committed co-financing of $571.31 million went largely unfulfilled.

Conclusions

The project's informal-settlement and resettlement record is markedly weaker than its infrastructure delivery. The World Bank recalled funding for the Nalukolongo drainage sub-component after the Uganda government failed to compensate Project Affected Persons, leaving only the Lubigi channel (62 billion UGX) and Nakamiro secondary channel (20 billion UGX) works completed. A community affected by the Lubigi channel works filed a formal complaint with the World Bank Inspection Panel in July 2021, alleging a coercive and exclusionary resettlement process; the case was resolved through 18 months of mediation, concluding in a Dispute Resolution Agreement in June 2023 with confidential terms. Separately, Ugandan investigative reporting found that of a $48 million institutional-strengthening grant intended for KCCA and eight other beneficiary authorities, the responsible central ministry allocated $18 million to itself, leaving only about $3.3 million for each of the nine implementing bodies. KIIDP is therefore a genuinely mixed case: strong, target-beating delivery on physical infrastructure, undercut by resettlement-compliance failures serious enough to trigger the World Bank's own accountability mechanism, and governance concerns over how shared funding was allocated.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Phase 1 (KIIDP): SDR 22 million (~$33.6M) IDA credit, 2008–2017. Phase 2 (KIIDP-2): $183.7M total, 2015–2021. Sits within a Greater Kampala Metropolitan Area vision scaled back from $3B to $1.18B, with $566M from the World Bank and $42.66M from AFD.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — KIIDP ran 2008–2017; KIIDP-2 ran 2015–2021 (overlapping). The Lubigi channel Inspection Panel complaint (filed July 2021) took 18 months of mediation, concluding with a Dispute Resolution Agreement in June 2023.
Staffing & skills
Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) — implementing agency, World Bank / IDA (financing), Agence Française de Développement (AFD, co-financing), Government of Uganda (co-financing; central ministry administered the institutional-strengthening grant)

Conditions for success

  • Institutional systems (property registers, road asset management, traffic management, revenue collection) built alongside physical works supported longer-term capacity
  • Phased design (KIIDP then KIIDP-2) allowed financing and scope to grow based on results of the first phase

Common failure modes

  • The World Bank recalled funding for the Nalukolongo drainage sub-component after the Ugandan government failed to compensate Project Affected Persons
  • A community affected by the Lubigi channel works filed a formal complaint with the World Bank Inspection Panel in July 2021 alleging a coercive and exclusionary resettlement process, resolved only after 18 months of mediation
  • Investigative reporting found the central ministry allocated itself $18 million of a $48 million institutional-strengthening grant meant for nine implementing authorities, leaving each with only about $3.3 million
  • Uganda's own committed co-financing of $571.31 million for the wider metropolitan vision went largely unfulfilled

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes ERDF — European Regional Development Fund

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful