evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Long-Term Visa for Remote Workers — Iceland's Narrowly-Targeted Nomad Scheme

Iceland · Reykjavík · See the Iceland profile · See the Reykjavík profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 100% 14/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Iceland's high-income-threshold remote-worker visa drew just 65 applications and 10 actual relocations in its first four months, with no further public uptake data since found.

65
Applications (first 4 months)
50
Approved (first 4 months)
10
Actually relocated (first 4 months)
5
Applications under review (first 4 months)
95 %
Applicants from US (first 4 months)
1,000,000 ISK (1,300,000 ISK with family)
Minimum monthly income

Details

Promoter
Directorate of Immigration (Útlendingastofnun), Ministry of Justice, Iceland
Period
2020–present
Region (NUTS)
IS00
Keywords
Digital nomad visa, remote work, immigration policy

Context

Iceland's Long-Term Visa for Remote Workers, introduced in October 2020 by the Directorate of Immigration (Útlendingastofnun) under the Ministry of Justice, lets non-EEA/EFTA nationals live in Iceland for up to six months (extendable) while continuing to work remotely for an employer or clients based abroad.

Objectives

Unlike many later 'digital nomad visa' schemes, it was framed narrowly: applicants must be exempt from Schengen visa requirements and meet a high income floor (1,000,000 ISK per month, or 1,300,000 ISK with family), and the visa explicitly does not grant access to Iceland's domestic labour market.

Results

Four months after launch, Iceland Review and NorthStack independently reported that the Directorate of Immigration had received 65 applications, approved 50, and that only 10 people had actually relocated to Iceland under the visa, with five more applications still under review. The applicant pool was heavily skewed toward the United States (95%), with the remainder from Canada and the UK.

Conclusions

With no later public statistics located, the visa's trajectory since its first year is not independently verifiable from open sources, but initial uptake — a few dozen people, in a country actively promoting remote-work tourism — was modest relative to comparable European schemes, likely reflecting both the high income threshold and Iceland's cost of living. It is best catalogued as an early, narrowly-targeted remote-worker visa whose initial reach was limited and whose subsequent performance remains publicly undocumented.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
Directorate of Immigration (Útlendingastofnun), Ministry of Justice

Common failure modes

  • High income floor (1,000,000 ISK/month, ~$7,700, or 1,300,000 ISK with family) is explicitly exclusionary
  • Applicant pool 95% from a single country (the US), indicating low diversity of access
  • No public statistics located beyond the first four months, so subsequent performance is undocumented
  • Visa explicitly excludes access to Iceland's domestic labour market

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 57

Portugal's D8 Digital Nomad Visa

Portugal

Portugal's D8 remote-worker visa, requiring income of 4x minimum wage, issued over 2,600 visas in its first year (Oct 2022–2023) …

★ 43

Namibia's Digital Nomad Visa (DNV)

Namibia

Namibia's October 2022 digital-nomad visa made it one of only five African countries offering one. By mid-2023 it had logged …