evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Malmö's Green Space Factor & Green Points — Biodiversity-Scored Courtyards in Bo01 (Västra Hamnen)

Sweden · Malmö · See the Sweden profile · See the Malmö profile

Top 89% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Malmö required Bo01 developers to meet a green space factor of 0.5 and pick ten of 35 'green points' (trees, bird boxes, ponds); later evaluations note green areas were partly replaced by hard surfaces as the system was simplified.

Malmö's Green Space Factor & Green Points — Biodiversity-Scored Courtyards in Bo01 (Västra Hamnen)

Details

Promoter
City of Malmö; Bo01 housing expo developers
Period
2000–present
Keywords
urban greening, green space factor, stormwater, biodiversity

Description

For the Bo01 housing exposition (opened May 2001) on a former contaminated shipyard in Västra Hamnen, the City of Malmö and the developers set a green space factor of 0.5 or greater and a 'Green Points' list: each developer chose ten of 35 options such as tall trees, bird houses and wildlife ponds, rewarding quality of habitat rather than area alone.
Stormwater is handled in an open system of rain gardens, ponds and canals, with green roofs and pervious surfaces, combining runoff reduction with habitat for native herbs and wildflowers.
Evidence is mixed. The Oppla/Connecting Nature case notes that landscape-architect involvement was central to early success, but that green areas in Bo01 were over time exchanged for hard surfaces and that later harbour districts used a simplified factor, producing less green. No quantified biodiversity or runoff outcomes for the factor itself were found, so the entry is scored cautiously. It is a transferable, low-cost planning instrument whose weakness is enforcement after approval.

Read the full analysis: https://connectingnature.oppla.eu/node/23362

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful