evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

MaRS Discovery District — Toronto's Research-to-Industry Innovation Hub

Canada · Toronto · See the Canada profile · See the Toronto profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 93% 43/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Incorporated in 2000 to commercialise University of Toronto and hospital research, MaRS grew into a large innovation hub — but its Phase 2 office tower required roughly CAD 400 million in Ontario government support between 2011 and 2014 before being repaid via 2017 refinancing.

20 CAD million
Initial provincial commitment (2002)
224 CAD million
Phase 2 tower completion loan (2011)
309-317.5 CAD million
Additional provincial funding, incl. CAD 65m developer buyout (2014)
~400 CAD million
Total provincial exposure (2011-2014)
~30 %
Phase 2 tower occupancy at time of 2014 bailout
290 CAD million
Private refinancing securing early loan repayment (2017)
1,400+ ventures
Ventures supported since 2010 (MaRS-reported)
75+ CAD million (to 161 ventures, 31 exits)
Investment Accelerator Fund seed funding
1.37 CAD billion
Investment Accelerator Fund follow-on funding raised
40 %
Revenue decline (2019-2023)
~20 positions
Staff cuts (2024)
MaRS Discovery District — Toronto's Research-to-Industry Innovation Hub

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
MaRS Discovery District
Period
2000–present
Keywords
Innovation hub, research commercialization, startup acceleration, corporate innovation

Context

MaRS Discovery District was incorporated in 2000 to commercialise University of Toronto and hospital research, following a 2004 provincial review recommending a dedicated research-commercialisation entity. It runs venture advisory services, an Investment Accelerator Fund (since 2008), a scale-up programme ('Momentum'), and space for corporate innovation partners, with its Phase 1 building opening in 2005.

Results

MaRS's own reporting cites over 1,400 ventures supported and several billion dollars in cumulative capital raised since 2010, and its Investment Accelerator Fund reports over CAD 75 million in seed funding to 161 ventures (31 exits) generating CAD 1.37 billion in follow-on funding — though the larger GDP/tax-revenue claims trace to a third-party economic study that could not be independently retrieved. MaRS is also a documented cautionary case in public risk-sharing: after its Phase 2 tower's private developer withdrew in 2008, Ontario provided a CAD 224 million loan (2011) to complete construction, then a further CAD 309-317.5 million (2014, including a CAD 65 million developer buyout) when the tower remained roughly 30% leased — bringing total provincial exposure to about CAD 400 million, which Ontario's Auditor General publicly called 'a bailout of a private sector development.' The tower reached full occupancy by 2016-17 and MaRS secured CAD 290 million in private refinancing in 2017, repaying most of the government loan roughly three years early. More recent Globe and Mail reporting (June 2024) documented a 40% revenue decline from 2019 to 2023, losses in every year analysed, and about 20 staff cuts amid a 'business model reset.'

Conclusions

The original mandate to commercialise University of Toronto and hospital research has, per multiple independent sources including Academic Matters, shifted over time toward broader startup support and commercial leasing.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
MaRS Discovery District management and venture-services advisory staff, Ontario provincial government as primary public funder/guarantor, University of Toronto and University Health Network hospital partners as founding research sources

Conditions for success

  • Founding coalition spanning a university, teaching hospitals and government to pool research-commercialisation resources in one hub
  • A dedicated seed-capital vehicle (Investment Accelerator Fund) alongside physical space and advisory services
  • Eventual private refinancing (CAD 290m, 2017) to reduce reliance on public loans

Common failure modes

  • Phase 2 tower required two rounds of provincial bailout (2011, 2014) totalling ~CAD 400 million after its private developer withdrew and occupancy stayed near 30% for years — publicly characterised by Ontario's Auditor General as 'a bailout of a private sector development'
  • Independent 2024 reporting documented a 40% revenue decline (2019-2023), losses every year analysed, and ~20 staff cuts amid a business-model reset
  • Headline economic-impact figures rely on an underlying third-party study that could not be independently verified

Where it fits

Governance type
non-profit corporation with university, hospital and provincial-government founders
Scale
single large urban hub (Toronto)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 71

KLAK — Icelandic Startups

Iceland

Iceland's main national business-accelerator body, tracing to a 2000 corporate innovation centre and a 2007 student-led non-profit merged in 2013, …