evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

MEP–CENECOOP National AI Training Platform — 90,000 Digitally-Endorsed Micro-Credential Scholarships for Costa Rican Educators

Costa Rica · San José · See the Costa Rica profile · See the San José profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 28% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Costa Rica's Ministry of Public Education, with CENECOOP, offers 90,000 virtual scholarships for a 32-hour, four-module AI-in-education course, awarding a tri-endorsed digital certificate to educators passing each module at 8/10 or above.

90,000
Scholarships offered
32 hours
Course length
4
Curriculum modules
225+
Learning resources
8/10
Module pass threshold
MEP–CENECOOP National AI Training Platform — 90,000 Digitally-Endorsed Micro-Credential Scholarships for Costa Rican Educators

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Ministerio de Educación Pública (MEP) with CENECOOP R.L., FUNDEPOS and NextGen Professionals
Period
April–December 2026
Keywords
public education, teacher training, AI literacy, micro-credentials

Context

In April 2026, Costa Rica's Ministerio de Educación Pública (MEP), together with the Centro de Estudios y Capacitación Cooperativa (CENECOOP R.L.), opened 90,000 scholarships for a national artificial-intelligence-in-education training programme aimed at classroom teachers, school directors and other educational leaders across the public system.

Objectives

Build AI literacy and skills among public-system educators at national scale through a verifiable, quality-assured micro-credential.

Activities

The course runs fully virtually and asynchronously from 27 April to 31 December 2026, with enrolment staggered across three registration windows (April, May and June). The curriculum totals 32 hours across four modules — AI fundamentals, technological tools, ethical AI use, and educational innovation — supported by more than 225 learning resources. To pass each module, participants must score at least 8 out of 10 on a module assessment.

Conclusions

This is a design-stage, at-scale credentialing initiative rather than a completed and evaluated one: as of this writing the training window is still open and no independent source yet reports completion rates, module-assessment results, or classroom impact. Its evidentiary strength lies in the explicit, verifiable design of the credential (a defined competency bar, tri-party endorsement, dedicated ethics module) rather than in demonstrated outcomes, which should be revisited once the programme closes at the end of 2026.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — 90,000 scholarships for a fully virtual, asynchronous 32-hour course delivered by an established cooperative training institution.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Runs 27 April to 31 December 2026, with three staggered enrolment windows (April, May, June).
Staffing & skills
Ministerio de Educación Pública (MEP) staff, CENECOOP R.L. trainers, FUNDEPOS (endorsing partner), NextGen Professionals (endorsing partner)

Conditions for success

  • Staggered enrolment across three registration windows to manage national-scale uptake
  • Defined competency bar (8/10 per module) rather than participation-only completion
  • Tri-party endorsement (FUNDEPOS, CENECOOP, NextGen Professionals) intended to validate credential quality beyond MEP alone
  • Dedicated ethical-AI-use module (one of four)

Common failure modes

  • Programme is still running with no completion, assessment, or classroom-impact data published yet; unproven at this stage

Where it fits

Governance type
national ministry partnered with a cooperative training institute and endorsing organisations
Scale
national
Income level
upper-middle income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful