New Jersey's Disability Information Hub — A Co-Created One-Stop Portal
United States of America
New Jersey's Disability Information Hub consolidates nearly 200 state programmes into one accessible portal designed with — not for — …
Canada · Toronto · See the Canada profile · See the Toronto profile
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 55% 72/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Since 2021, Ontario's Digital Service Standard has made testing with disabled people — screen readers, 400% zoom, automated and manual checks — mandatory for every government digital service, backed by public Inclusive Design Cards covering five accessibility themes.
Since January 2021, the Government of Ontario's Digital Service Standard has made accessibility mandatory, not optional, for every digital product and service the government builds. Standard #7, "Make it accessible and inclusive", requires teams to meet WCAG 2.1 level AA and to test directly with people with disabilities.
The standard aims to ensure government digital services are genuinely usable by people with disabilities, not just technically compliant, by requiring hands-on testing rather than relying on automated checks alone.
Standard #7 requires teams to test manually, with an automated checker, with a screen reader, and by zooming to 400%, as well as with users who have lower digital skills or limited connectivity. To support this, Ontario Digital Service publishes free Inclusive Design Cards (first released December 2017, still updated as of August 2025), organised around five themes — empathy-centred design, physical accessibility, audio experiences, visual experiences and cognitive accessibility — downloadable as PDF and Word files from GitHub to help teams design inclusively before a product is built, not just audit it afterwards. The standard was developed by drawing on comparable digital service standards from Canada's Canadian Digital Service, the UK's Government Digital Service and Australia's Digital Transformation Agency, and is corroborated independently by eCampusOntario's own accessibility documentation, which confirms the WCAG 2.1 AA testing requirement and the use of accessibility advisory panels that include people with differing abilities.
Neither Ontario's own site nor independent sources report how many services have actually been tested with disabled users, or what issues that testing has found and fixed. The practice is a well-documented, mandatory policy framework, but its real-world enforcement and outcomes are not independently evidenced.
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United States of America
New Jersey's Disability Information Hub consolidates nearly 200 state programmes into one accessible portal designed with — not for — …
Norway
NAV's official design system embeds accessibility beyond minimum WCAG requirements into every team's UI components, with 220,263 live component instances …
Argentina
Argentina's ONTI monitors public-sector websites under Ley 26.653 and Decreto 656/2019, requiring a progressive rise from 50 to 80 WCAG-based …
Netherlands
A 'relay model' where specialists from Dutch national and municipal bodies co-design shared, accessibility-tested components — user research explicitly includes …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.