evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Poland's Drought Effects Counteracting Plan — Wody Polskie Retention Investments

Poland · Warsaw · See the Poland profile · See the Warsaw profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 92% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Poland's statutory Drought Effects Counteracting Plan, run by State Water Holding Wody Polskie, has completed 55 small-scale retention investments worth almost 150 million PLN, while the country retains only about 7.5% of average annual river runoff against a ~15% potential.

55 investments
Completed retention investments
150 million PLN (almost)
Value of completed investments
23 investments
Additional investments completed
60 million PLN (over)
Value of additional completed investments
119 million PLN (more than)
Additional work underway value
76.5 million PLN
Floodplain/valley renaturalisation co-financing
30-40 %
Farmer-reported crop yield increase
7.5 % of average annual runoff
National river runoff retained
15 % (approx.)
Estimated natural retention potential
20 cm
Vistula record-low water level in Warsaw (September 2024)
73 %
Gauging stations reporting low water (September 2024)
Poland's Drought Effects Counteracting Plan — Wody Polskie Retention Investments

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie (Polish State Water Holding)
Period
2021–2027 (plan period), rolling investment programme
Keywords
water management, agriculture, drought resilience, infrastructure

Context

Poland has among the lowest per-capita renewable water resources in Europe (roughly a third of the EU average). The statutory Drought Effects Counteracting Plan (DECP), based on Poland's Water Law Act implementing the EU Water Framework Directive, sets out drought-risk measures for 2021-2027. The State Water Holding Wody Polskie administers the plan and is running a public consultation to update it ('Stop Suszy! Start Retencji!'), targeting adoption around 2027-2028.

Objectives

Reduce drought risk by rebuilding small-scale water retention infrastructure and slowing runoff, reassessing drought risk by river basin and commune.

Activities

Under the plan, 55 completed investments (worth almost 150 million PLN) have rebuilt small water-damming structures on minor watercourses, restored the retention function of drainage systems, and slowed runoff from agricultural land. Agency reporting also cites 23 further investments (over 60 million PLN) completed and more than 119 million PLN of additional work underway, alongside a separate 76.5 million PLN co-financing stream for floodplain/valley renaturalisation.

Results

Farmers in project areas report that local retention works eased drought impacts and lifted crop yields by 30-40%, though these figures are self-reported rather than independently audited. Nationally, Poland still retains only about 7.5% of average annual river runoff, versus an estimated natural potential of around 15%.

Conclusions

The September 2024 record-low Vistula water level in Warsaw (20 cm, with 73% of gauging stations reporting low water) illustrates how far the country still has to go.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Roughly 150 million PLN (55 investments) plus 60 million PLN (23 more investments), over 119 million PLN of work underway, and a separate 76.5 million PLN renaturalisation co-financing stream.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Statutory plan period 2021-2027; update process ('Stop Suszy! Start Retencji!') targeting adoption around 2027-2028; rolling investment programme.
Staffing & skills
Panstwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie (State Water Holding) — national administering agency

Conditions for success

  • Statutory basis under Poland's Water Law Act, implementing the EU Water Framework Directive
  • Structured public consultation process for periodic plan updates
  • Small-scale, distributed retention works targeted by river basin and commune

Common failure modes

  • National retention rate remains far below potential (7.5% retained vs an estimated 15% potential)
  • Farmer-reported yield gains are self-reported and not independently audited

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful