evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Rwanda's Gender Equality Seal — Certifying Workplaces on Pay, Leadership & Harassment

Rwanda · Kigali · See the Rwanda profile · See the Kigali profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 68% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Rwanda's Gender Equality Seal certifies employers on pay gaps, women's leadership and harassment policy. Formalised in 2023 as Africa's first national gender-equality standard, it awarded 19 organisations gold/silver/bronze seals in May 2024.

19
Organisations recognised (May 2024)
7
Gold seals awarded (May 2024)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Rwanda Gender Monitoring Office (GMO), Private Sector Federation (PSF) & Rwanda Standards Board (RSB)
Period
2017-present
Keywords
private sector, public institutions, workplace certification, gender standards

Context

Rwanda's Gender Equality Seal, launched by the Gender Monitoring Office with the Private Sector Federation and support from UNDP, UN Women and USAID, has companies self-assess against gender-equality criteria.

Activities

In 2023 the Rwanda Standards Board formalised the approach as National Standard RS 560:2023, described as Africa's first national gender-equality certification standard.

Results

At a May 2024 Kigali ceremony, 19 companies and institutions received recognition - 7 gold seals, 2 silver, 3 bronze and 7 recognised for adopting GES processes.

Conclusions

No publicly available dataset yet quantifies aggregate pay-gap reduction across certified organisations.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Gender Monitoring Office and Private Sector Federation reviewers

Conditions for success

  • formal national standard (RS 560:2023)
  • UNDP/UN Women/USAID technical support

Common failure modes

  • rests on employer self-assessment, not independent third-party wage audits

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful