evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Sierra Leone's GIS-Supported Teacher Deployment Algorithm

Sierra Leone · Freetown · See the Sierra Leone profile

Sierra Leone's Teaching Service Commission, with EdTech Hub and Fab Inc., built a Nobel-inspired matching algorithm pairing teachers' preferences with school needs. In 2024/25, 56% of 2,000 new teacher posts went to the 10 most disadvantaged districts.

56 %
New teaching positions assigned to the 10 most disadvantaged districts (2024/25)
53 %
New early-childhood-development positions assigned to disadvantaged districts (2024/25)
2,000
New teaching positions funded by Ministry of Finance (2024/25)
1,000
New early-childhood-development positions (2024/25)
92 %
Budget execution rate (2023/24)
78 %
Budget execution baseline (2019)
10 of 16 districts
Disadvantaged districts targeted
4.5 USD million
GPE financing tied to results indicators

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Teaching Service Commission of Sierra Leone / EdTech Hub / Learning Generation Initiative / Fab Inc.
Period
2024/25 deployment cycle – ongoing
Keywords
teacher deployment, education workforce planning, matching algorithm, GIS, rural equity

Context

Sierra Leone has struggled to place qualified teachers in disadvantaged rural/remote districts, facing high turnover, subject-specialist shortages in maths/science, and under-representation of female teachers. The Teaching Service Commission (TSC), with the Ministry of Basic and Senior Secondary Education, EdTech Hub, the Learning Generation Initiative and analytics firm Fab Inc., built on earlier UK Aid-funded GIS analysis of pupil-teacher-ratio disparities.

Objectives

To replace ad hoc, discretion-heavy teacher placement with a data-driven, rules-based deployment mechanism that better matches teachers to schools while directing more new positions to the 10 most disadvantaged of Sierra Leone's 16 districts (identified via national exam and learning-assessment results).

Activities

For the 2024/25 deployment cycle, the TSC introduced an open-source GIS-supported preference-matching algorithm adapted from the deferred-acceptance ("stable matching") design used in Nobel Prize-winning work matching doctors to hospitals and patients to kidney donors. Schools list required teacher attributes (subject specialism, experience, gender balance, willingness to stay); teachers list preferred locations including language and family ties; the algorithm produces placements respecting both sides' preferences.

Results

For the 2024/25 academic year, 56% of the 2,000 new Ministry of Finance-funded teaching positions and 53% of 1,000 new early-childhood-development positions were assigned to the 10 disadvantaged districts, meeting a results indicator tied to $4.5 million of GPE financing. A companion budget-execution target rose to 92% in 2023/24, from a 2019 baseline of 78%.

Conclusions

This is a genuine step toward data-driven deployment, with criteria and results externally verified through GPE's results-based financing mechanism. There is no independent evaluation yet of downstream effects on teacher retention, pupil-teacher ratios or learning outcomes, and disparities may be larger within districts than between them, so district-level targeting may not fully close intra-district gaps.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Built on earlier UK Aid-funded GIS analysis; algorithm is open-source, implemented by a small technical team; exact system-build cost not disclosed.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Preceded by earlier GIS analysis, then deployed for the 2024/25 teacher deployment cycle onward.
Staffing & skills
Teaching Service Commission staff, Ministry of Basic and Senior Secondary Education staff, EdTech Hub technical team, Fab Inc. data analysts

Conditions for success

  • Reliable GIS/administrative data on school needs and teacher preferences
  • Political buy-in from Ministry of Finance for funded positions
  • External verification mechanism (e.g., GPE results-based financing) to ensure accountability

Common failure modes

  • District-level targeting may mask larger within-district disparities
  • No independent evaluation yet of effects on teacher retention or learning outcomes

Where it fits

Governance type
national government (Teaching Service Commission)
Scale
national
Income level
low-income

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful