evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Singapore's AI-in-Education Ethics Framework — Four National Principles Behind a Free, Centrally Vetted School AI Platform

Singapore · Singapore · See the Singapore profile · See the Singapore profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 31% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Singapore's MOE issued a 2024 AI-in-Education Ethics Framework (Agency, Inclusivity, Fairness, Safety) on IMDA's national AI governance model, enforced by requiring AI tools on the free Student Learning Space to use local training data and pass a whitelisting review.

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ministry of Education (MOE), with the Government Technology Agency (GovTech)
Period
2024–present
Keywords
AI governance, ethics, data protection, K-12 education technology

Context

Singapore's Ministry of Education (MOE) released an AI-in-Education Ethics Framework in 2024 built on four principles — Agency, Inclusivity, Fairness, and Safety — operationalised through the free, national Student Learning Space (SLS) platform available to all students and educators in publicly funded schools.

Objectives

The framework aims to preserve students' and teachers' choice and control over AI-supported decisions while ensuring inclusive, fair, and safe use of AI tools in classrooms, embedded within the broader EdTech Masterplan 2030 for institutional continuity.

Activities

AI tools must be trained on Singapore-specific data to reduce algorithmic bias and must pass a mandatory MOE whitelisting review before being approved for classroom deployment; tools deemed unsafe are rejected outright.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Education (MOE), Government Technology Agency (GovTech), Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA)

Conditions for success

  • Mandatory AI-tool whitelisting review before classroom deployment
  • AI tools trained on local Singapore data to reduce algorithmic bias
  • Embedding within a longer-term institutional plan (EdTech Masterplan 2030) rather than a standalone initiative

Where it fits

Governance type
national ministry-led
Scale
national
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful