Talk to the City — Taiwan's AI-Clustering Tool for AI Policy Alignment Assemblies
Taiwan
Taiwan's Ministry of Digital Affairs used the open-source LLM tool Talk to the City to cluster public opinions from AI-policy …
Taiwan · Taipei · See the Taiwan profile · See the Taipei profile
Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 35% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Taiwan's vTaiwan feeds the open-source Pol.is machine-learning engine into the government's Join platform, mapping citizen opinions into consensus statements across 26+ national policy consultations since 2015; petitions over 5,000 signatures compel a government response.
Following Taiwan's 2014 Sunflower Movement protests over closed-door trade negotiations, civic technologists and the government built vTaiwan, a structured process for turning contentious digital-policy debates into actionable consensus. Its core tool, Pol.is, is an open-source machine-learning system that lets thousands of participants submit short statements and vote agree/disagree/pass, with principal-component analysis clustering participants by opinion pattern in real time to surface where opposing groups actually agree rather than forcing a single up-or-down vote.
Results feed into the government's Join e-petition and consultation platform: petitions that gather over 5,000 endorsements within 60 days compel a formal agency response. The National Development Council has continued to run Join and cite vTaiwan-style consultations for AI governance and platform-regulation debates.
By 2018 the process had been applied to 26 national digital-policy issues; in the 2015 Uber ridesharing consultation, Pol.is clustering found 95% of participants converged on passenger safety as a shared priority despite sharp disagreement elsewhere, informing the resulting regulatory proposal.
The process has real limits: vTaiwan itself is not government-mandated, so officials can acknowledge a consensus without acting on it, and after initial government sponsorship the process shifted to a fully volunteer-run civic structure, constraining how many issues it can take on. Participation still skews toward digitally literate, urban citizens, and facilitators must do substantial manual work framing each debate before the clustering algorithm can run.
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Taiwan
Taiwan's Ministry of Digital Affairs used the open-source LLM tool Talk to the City to cluster public opinions from AI-policy …
Germany
Germany's most forested district piloted deliberAIde, an AI platform that transcribes, anonymises and clusters citizen input at social-planning conferences, helping …
Switzerland
Aarau's first city-wide participatory budget (2023-24) used the Method of Equal Shares to allocate CHF 50,000, funding 17 of 33 …
France
Since 2021 France's VIGINUM service has tracked foreign disinformation networks with AI tools; in 2025 it open-sourced D3lta, an LLM-based …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.