WeSign gives deaf and hard-of-hearing Hanoi primary pupils real-time, AI-scored feedback on fingerspelling and sign formation via webcam. A 30-participant pilot scored 92.58/100 on the System Usability Scale; the underlying recognition model reaches up to 95% accuracy.
30 educators across 3 specialised institutions
Needs-assessment survey respondents
30
Pilot participants (teachers and pupils) (2025-2026)
92.58/100
System Usability Scale score (overall)
94.00
System Usability Scale score - teachers
92.30
System Usability Scale score - students
>91%
Fingerspelling recognition accuracy on raw video
95%
Fingerspelling recognition accuracy on processed data
Details
Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Hanoi University of Science and Technology; Hanoi National University of Education; Hanoi Metropolitan University
Vietnam's Ministry of Education and Training has issued national standards for Vietnamese Sign Language (VSL) instruction, but teachers of deaf and hard-of-hearing pupils often lack the fluency to model precise fingerspelling and sign production, and self-directed practice at home is rare. Researchers from Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi National University of Education, and Hanoi Metropolitan University built WeSign to address this gap.
Objectives
To give deaf and hard-of-hearing primary pupils real-time, AI-scored feedback on fingerspelling and sign formation via webcam, supporting VSL learning aligned with the Ministry's national standards.
Activities
First-grade lesson content was co-developed with teachers at a specialised school for deaf children in Hanoi, aligned to the Ministry's Circular on national VSL standards. The team ran a mixed-methods evaluation: a needs-assessment survey of 30 educators across three specialised institutions, followed by a pilot with 30 participants (teachers and pupils) at one specialised Hanoi school.
Results
System Usability Scale results averaged 92.58 out of 100 ('best imaginable'), with teachers rating it 94.00 and students 92.30. A related paper by an overlapping research team benchmarked the underlying fingerspelling recognition model at over 91% accuracy on raw video and 95% on processed data across 23 VSL alphabet signs and 2 accent marks.
Conclusions
The evidence base is still early: the classroom pilot measured usability and acceptance rather than measured learning gains, involved a single school and 30 participants, and the published sources do not detail data-protection or consent safeguards for the video capture the recognition feature depends on.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Not disclosed; involves webcam-based AI recognition software development by three university partners.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Needs assessment then pilot conducted within the 2025-2026 period at one Hanoi school.
Staffing & skills
university research teams (Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi Metropolitan University), teachers at a specialised Hanoi school for deaf children co-developing lesson content
Conditions for success
co-design of lesson content with teachers at a specialised school for deaf children
alignment to the Ministry of Education and Training's national VSL standards circular
Common failure modes
single-school, 30-participant evidence base with no reported cost model or deployment plan beyond the pilot
no documented data-protection or consent safeguards for webcam video capture
STMicroelectronics Foundation, ITU and a blind Milan professor run train-the-trainer digital-literacy classes for blind and visually-impaired adults in Dakar. An …
DepEd's ARAL programme uses Microsoft Reading Progress to automate reading-fluency assessments; a Cabanatuan pilot reduced at-risk readers from 14 to …