evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Zhongguancun Science Park (Z-Park) — China's National Innovation Hub

China · Beijing · See the China profile · See the Beijing profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 18% 81/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Established in 1988, Zhongguancun (ZGC) in Beijing's Haidian District is China's first and largest national science park. By 2024 it hosted 28,300 high-tech enterprises, 93 unicorn companies, and 2.7 million employees generating ~7.6 trillion yuan in revenue.

28300
High-tech enterprises hosted (2024)
93
Unicorn companies (2024)
Zhongguancun Science Park (Z-Park) — China's National Innovation Hub

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Zhongguancun Science Park Administrative Committee (Beijing Municipal Government)
Period
1988–present
Keywords
science parks, technology incubation, startups, R&D

Context

Zhongguancun Science Park (ZGC), established in 1988 and formally named in 1999, is China's premier innovation district, administered by the Beijing Municipal Government and spanning 'One Zone, Sixteen Parks' plus an expansion into Xiong'an New Area.

Results

By 2024, ZGC hosted ~28,300 high-tech enterprises and 93 unicorns, with 532 listed companies generating ~7.6 trillion yuan in revenue and 2.7 million employees; the park registered 8,776 PCT patent applications and ranked first nationally in MIIT's 2024 evaluation.

Conclusions

Governance transparency and market access for foreign firms remain notable limitations, per independent commentary.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
park administrative committee staff, incubator and makerspace managers

Conditions for success

  • anchor universities (Peking, Tsinghua, CAS)
  • sustained state R&D investment
  • national high-tech zone policy status

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful