Top 86%
neste catálogo (1069 práticas pontuadas)
As pontuações concentram-se em valores altos, pelo que a posição dentro do catálogo é muitas vezes mais reveladora do que o número isolado.
Transferability / replicability2/3
The trial design spanned 14 agencies and its lesson (test blind hiring before adopting it) applies to any employer considering anonymised CVs.
Impact on gender equality0/1
De-identification reduced women's shortlisting likelihood by 2.9% relative to identified applications, so it did not advance equality in this trial.
Effectiveness0/1
BETA concluded anonymised shortlisting does not appear to assist diversity and may frustrate it.
Efficiency0/1
Anonymising applications costs administrative effort yet delivered no measured gain for women in the trial.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
It is a randomised trial of over 2,100 public servants published by a government evaluation unit.
Sustainability0/1
The measure was not shown to produce lasting gains and BETA advised caution before rolling it out.
Achievement / evidence1/1
The trial achieved a clear, honest finding with a stated caveat that tasks were hypothetical rather than real hires.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding0/1
It tested a single recruitment-stage tool and did not embed a broader gender-mainstreaming approach.
Curator validation0/1
Not yet validated by a curator.
Evidoria. Ensaio de recrutamento anonimizado da BETA — a seleção anónima não ajudou as mulheres na função pública australiana (caso de alerta). ID persistente: aa462bbf-4846-480c-9f9c-de5e5949a844.