Browse practices

Catalogue: AI in the Public Sector clear

This selection at a glance

matching practices

strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Observational / pre–post 1

Descriptive / self-reported 4

3 practices not yet assessed for evidence strength.

Most practices in: Denmark (8)

8 result(s) Sort Download CSV Get alerts for this search Cards List

Title	Evidence	Standing	Type	Location	Scale
Børge — Denmark's AI writing assistant for the borger.dk citizen portal's editors	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	Top 13% 80/100	Good practice	Copenhagen, Denmark	—
Denmark's AI Regulatory Sandbox — Testing AI Projects for GDPR and AI Act Compliance	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	Top 35% 67/100	Good practice	Copenhagen, Denmark	—
Skattestyrelsen Transaction Network Analysis — Denmark’s machine-learning VAT carousel-fraud detector	Evidence: Observational / pre–post	Top 49% 60/100	Good practice	Copenhagen, Denmark	—
Capital Region of Denmark's AI-Assisted Emergency Call Triage — Corti's Speech-Recognition System for Cardiac Arrest and Stroke Detection	Not assessed	Top 65% 53/100	Good practice	Copenhagen, Denmark	—
Udbetaling Danmark's 60-Model Fraud System — Denmark's AI Welfare State Faces an Ombudsman Inquiry	Not assessed	Top 75% 47/100	Good practice	Hillerød, Denmark	—
Denmark's Automated Property Valuation Model — 8 Years Late and 51 Times Over Budget	Not assessed	Top 75% 47/100	Good practice	Sakskøbing, Denmark	—
Sensemaking AI for Lejre Municipality's Citizen Planning Input	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	Top 83% 40/100	Good practice	Lejre, Denmark	—
The Gladsaxe Model — Denmark's Halted Points-Based Child-Welfare Risk Score	Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported	Top 98% 20/100	Good practice	Gladsaxe, Denmark	—