evidoria

← Volver al listado

Buena práctica Importada

Programa de Gestión Comunitaria de Recursos Naturales (CBNRM) de Botsuana

Botsuana · Kasane · Ver el perfil de Botsuana

Evidencia: Observacional / pre-post Top 90% 27/100 · Pregunte a Evidence Copilot sobre esta práctica

La política nacional de CBNRM de Botsuana (2007, pilotada desde los años 90) canaliza ingresos del turismo y la caza hacia unos 100 fideicomisos comunitarios que cubren ~22% del territorio nacional, junto a una población de elefantes en recuperación, pero con casos documentados de captura por élites, reparto desigual de ingresos y una costosa prohibición de caza entre 2014-2019.

80,000 elephants
Elephant population (1996) (1996)
129,000+ elephants
Elephant population (2014) (2014)
22 % of national territory
CBNRM/WMA land coverage (2004)
150 villages (10 districts)
Villages participating in CBNRM (mid-2000s (2005))
135,000 people
People involved in CBNRM (mid-2000s (2005))
200,000 USD
Chobe Enclave revenue (2002)
6 million USD
Lost licence fees during national hunting ban (2014-2019)
100 trusts
Active community trusts (present)
Programa de Gestión Comunitaria de Recursos Naturales (CBNRM) de Botsuana

Detalles

Madurez
Consolidada
Promotor
Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources Conservation and Tourism, Botswana
Período
1990s-present (national policy since 2007)
Palabras clave
wildlife conservation, community trusts, tourism revenue-sharing, benefit-sharing, conservation policy

Contexto

Botswana's Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Programme lets communal-area villages form registered Community-Based Organisations (CBOs) or Trusts that hold leases over Wildlife Management Areas and Controlled Hunting Areas, earning tourism and (when permitted) safari-hunting concession revenue in exchange for managing wildlife and other natural resources on their land.

Actividades

Piloted from the early 1990s (the Chobe Enclave project from 1993 is an early example) and formalised nationally by the CBNRM Policy of 2007. Under the policy's revenue-sharing rule, 65% of proceeds from a CBO's sale of hunting quotas or concessions goes to the National Environmental Fund, with the CBO retaining the rest.

Resultados

By the mid-2000s roughly 150 villages across 10 districts and about 135,000 people (roughly one-tenth of the population) were involved, with CBNRM/WMA land covering about 22% of national territory by 2004. The Chobe Enclave earned about USD 200,000 in 2002, two-thirds from hunting. Elephant numbers rose from an estimated 80,000 in 1996 to over 129,000 by 2014 and have remained above 130,000 for roughly 15 years. CBO registrations stagnated between 2009 and 2012, and a 2014-2019 national hunting ban cost an estimated USD 6 million in lost licence fees affecting around 800 families before being reversed in 2019; pre-ban safari hunting supported roughly 600 jobs and about 15% of tourism revenue, with CBNRM-linked tourism overall estimated at about 3.5% of total tourism value. Around 100 community trusts are currently active.

Conclusiones

Peer-reviewed and policy literature documents elite capture within some trusts, weak business capacity, and uneven distribution of revenue among members.

Implementación

Coste indicativo
Medio (50 000–500 000 €) — Revenue-sharing rule: 65% of a CBO's proceeds from hunting quota/concession sales go to the National Environmental Fund; Chobe Enclave earned ~USD 200,000 in 2002 (two-thirds from hunting); the 2014-2019 hunting ban cost an estimated USD 6 million in lost licence fees.
Tiempo hasta resultados
Largo (> 3 años) — Piloted from the early 1990s (Chobe Enclave project, 1993); formalised nationally by the CBNRM Policy of 2007; national hunting ban 2014-2019, reversed in 2019; roughly 100 community trusts currently active.

Condiciones para el éxito

  • National CBNRM Policy (2007) formalising community leases over WMAs/CHAs
  • Revenue-sharing rule (65% of hunting/concession proceeds to National Environmental Fund) providing a consistent national framework

Modos de fallo comunes

  • Elite capture within some community trusts
  • Weak business capacity in some CBOs
  • Uneven distribution of revenue among members
  • CBO registrations stagnated 2009-2012
  • 2014-2019 national hunting ban disrupted CBNRM hunting revenue, costing an estimated $6 million in lost licence fees and affecting ~800 families

Habitualmente financiado por

National / regional programmes

Vías de financiación indicativas para prácticas de este tipo: compruebe siempre las convocatorias vigentes y las reglas de elegibilidad de cada programa.

¿Usted implementa esta práctica? Reivindíquela — los implementadores verificados obtienen un contacto público en la página y pueden proponer correcciones.

Fuentes de datos

De dónde se obtuvo la información de esta práctica, y cuándo.

Adjuntos

Prácticas similares que pueden serle útiles