Top 93%
en este catálogo (1043 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Evidence of impact / measured results1/3
Participation figures (≈15,000 voters, 2025) are documented, but delivery is thin — only 0.4% of 2,595 proposals fully implemented per an academic review — and no outcome evaluation exists.
Transferability / demonstrated replication2/3
Online proposal-and-vote participatory budgets are widely replicated, and Budapest's five-category structure is simple to copy, though the delivery weaknesses would travel too.
Scalability2/3
The scheme already runs city-wide at HUF 1bn a year with paper and online voting, but the implementation pipeline has not kept pace with proposal volume.
Sustainability / continuity1/3
Five annual cycles (2020–2025) show continuity, but the reported implementation deficit is flagged by researchers as a threat to long-term legitimacy.
Innovation1/3
A conventional participatory-budget design with an online platform; its novelty lies in city-wide scale rather than in method.
Inclusiveness / equity1/3
Paper voting (745 participants in 2025) widens access, but no equity data was verified and the review raises spatial-justice concerns.
Multi-stakeholder collaboration1/3
Resident ideas are screened by municipal professionals and voted on by the public, giving a two-party city–resident process without documented wider partnerships.
Evidoria. Presupuesto Participativo de Budapest (Közösségi Költségvetés) — Votación anual de 1.000 millones de HUF con una ejecución frágil. ID persistente: d54f2d3a-ac1a-433d-b05f-b704ca36efbb.