Top 63%
en este catálogo (1071 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Evidence of impact / measured results2/3
A Scottish Government-commissioned evaluation (Glasgow Caledonian University, fieldwork 2016-2018) assessed impacts on communities, services, democracy and inequalities, though its interim report found limited demonstrable impact on local services.
Transferability / demonstrated replication2/3
The national framework gives other councils a documented route to adopt PB, and the evaluation reviews how authorities approach the 1% target.
Scalability2/3
57,000 people took part in government-supported PB in 2017-18 and the target is 1% of council budgets by 2021, but moving from ~£10,000 area allocations to larger sums is a major institutional shift.
Sustainability / continuity2/3
A COSLA-Scottish Government framework agreement and a dedicated fund (£1.5m, 91 applications in 2017-18) support continuity beyond pilots.
Innovation1/3
The model itself is borrowed from earlier PB practice; the novelty is a national mainstreaming target.
Inclusiveness / equity2/3
The evaluation explicitly examined tackling inequalities, though the interim report did not demonstrate service-level change.
Multi-stakeholder collaboration2/3
Public bodies, community organisations, COSLA and the Scottish Government jointly funded and delivered PB processes.
Evidoria. Community Choices de Escocia — Programa nacional de presupuestos participativos y meta del 1 % del presupuesto, evaluado en 2016-2018. ID persistente: be3eec9e-faa2-4fd7-836f-0827e7891845.