Top 79%
en este catálogo (1040 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Transferability / replicability2/3
The GRPFM framework had already been piloted in seven other countries before Norway, and its nine standardised indicators are explicitly built for cross-country comparison, though this was its first use in a high-income state.
Impact on gender equality0/1
The pilot assessed the design of the budget process, not measured public-value outcomes, and reported no evidence of improved gender-equity results from the process itself.
Effectiveness0/1
The assessment explicitly found gender is not mainstreamed in the preparation of the state budget and that there is no gender tracking of expenditure.
Efficiency0/1
No cost or resource-efficiency data for the budgeting practice was reported in the assessment.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
Norway's budget process was formally scored against all nine GRPFM indicators by Norad and the PEFA Secretariat in 2020.
Sustainability0/1
The exercise was a one-off pilot; the Ministry of Finance's 2020 response described only an intention to explore changes, with no confirmed follow-up assessment since.
Achievement / evidence0/1
Norway scored reasonably on only two of the nine indicators (gender information in the budget proposal and in annual reporting) and low on the remaining seven.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1
Gender mainstreaming in budgeting is the explicit subject of the assessment, using a standardised nine-indicator framework built specifically for that purpose.
Curator validation1/1
Findings are corroborated across two independent sources on different domains: Norad's published assessment (norad.no) and the PEFA Secretariat's own project record (pefa.org).
Evidoria. Proyecto piloto PEFA de gestión de las finanzas públicas sensible al género en Noruega. ID persistente: 17eaf928-ce00-45dc-811e-1a9314599355.