Top 22%
dans ce catalogue (719 pratiques notées)
Les scores se concentrent dans le haut de l’échelle ; la position au sein du catalogue est donc souvent plus parlante que le chiffre seul.
Transferability / replicability2/3
The statutory civil-penalty and rapid-removal design is well-documented and portable, though no other country's confirmed adoption of the exact model was found.
Impact on gender equality1/1
eSafety's own data shows a 960% rise in reports handled (849 to 9,060 annually) with 19,468 total reports over five years.
Effectiveness1/1
An 89.9% full-or-partial removal success rate on the 1,961 platform requests sent is a concrete, agency-verified effectiveness metric.
Efficiency0/1
Only 4 formal takedown notices were issued against 219 informal requests in 2024-25, indicating strained enforcement capacity relative to report volume.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
eSafety's own transparency reporting plus an independent peer-reviewed case study (Tandfonline, 2025) evaluate the scheme's operation.
Sustainability1/1
The scheme has operated continuously since 2015, was expanded by statute in 2021, and remains under active legal refinement in 2026.
Achievement / evidence1/1
A Federal Court-ordered $343,500 penalty against a named offender demonstrates the scheme carries real enforceable consequences.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1
eSafety data showing 99% of deepfake pornographic material targets women and girls grounds the scheme's design explicitly in gendered harm evidence.
Curator validation1/1
Sourced from eSafety's own transparency reports and media releases, an independent academic case study, and Australian news coverage.
Evidoria. Dispositif contre les abus d'images de l'eSafety Commissioner — La réponse légale australienne au partage non consenti d'images intimes et aux deepfakes. ID persistant: 27ee52f5-3165-4e0b-afcf-e85c81009e41.