evidoria

What works in Thimphu

All catalogues · Bhutan profile

7
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
14%
strong evidence, of 7 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +65 pts 100 here · 35 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +49 pts 100 here · 51 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +47 pts 100 here · 53 average

Equity & inclusion +29 pts 83 here · 54 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +25 pts 33 here · 9 average

Evidence of learning impact +20 pts 50 here · 30 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Evaluation evidence +14 pts 50 here · 36 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +11 pts 50 here · 39 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Sustainability -13 pts 67 here · 80 average

Governance, certification & transferability -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Demonstrated reach -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -60 pts 0 here · 60 average

Effectiveness -81 pts 0 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality -83 pts 0 here · 83 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 35
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 51
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 53
Equity & inclusion
83 · 54
Documented learning
100 · 73
Curator validation
100 · 75
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 9
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 30
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Evaluation evidence
50 · 36
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 39
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Innovation level
70 · 64
Scalability & sustainability
67 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 50
Transferability / replicability
50 · 59
Sustainability
67 · 80
Governance, certification & transferability
50 · 66
Demonstrated reach
50 · 75
Efficiency
0 · 52
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
0 · 60
Effectiveness
0 · 81
Impact on gender equality
0 · 83

Coloured bar: Thimphu. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Bhutan for Life — Project Finance for Permanence (Bhutan) · 87

Bhutan National Digital Identity (NDI) – Self-Sovereign ID for All Citizens · 80

UNICEF, Bhutan's Ministry of Education & PubCoder — AI-Automated Accessible Digital Textbooks for Students with Disabilities · 73

Gender Responsive Planning and Budgeting — Bhutan's National Commission for Women and Children · 63

Eduten — AI-Adaptive Maths Platform Rolled Out Nationwide in Bhutan's Primary Schools · 60

Gewog Community Centres (CCs) · 48

Nola Chatbot — Bhutan's Student-Built AI Assistant for Government Agencies · 7

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more