evidoria

What works in Barbados

All catalogues

8
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 7 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Barbados

Barbados has implemented several digital and economic programmes with documented scale but variable take-up. The National Digital Skills Empowerment Campaign has completed 12,000+ digital courses through a Coursera partnership, yet a 2026 assessment found 41% of employees still lack essential digital skills, prompting a two-track upskilling initiative. The Barbados Welcome Stamp remote-work visa received 5,164 applications and generated US$6 million+ in fee revenue by April 2024, though only about a third of approved applicants actually activated their visas and took up residence. A Joint SDG Fund Programme concluded in November 2024 produced Barbados's first-ever national gender-disaggregated measurement of unpaid domestic and care work, expanding the country's statistical capacity on priority development indicators.

Drawn from: National Digital Skills Empowerment Campaign (NTI) · Joint SDG Fund Programme for Gender-Responsive Population Data (Barbados) · Barbados Welcome Stamp · Barbados Welcome Stamp — a Pioneer 12-Month Remote-Work Visa · Standards and Guidelines for the Use of AI in Assessment — Caribbean Examinations Council's Region-Wide AI Policy for CSEC, CAPE and CCSLC · AI Pair-Programming to Rebuild Barbados's Government Website · CXC's AI-Analysed Diagnostic Literacy & Numeracy System for Caribbean Secondary Schools · Barbados Blue Bond Debt Conversion for Marine Conservation

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Sustainability / continuity -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Equity & inclusion -19 pts 33 here · 52 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 37 average

Inclusiveness / equity -25 pts 17 here · 42 average

Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 59
Scalability
67 · 64
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Innovation
64 · 63
Transferability / demonstrated replication
58 · 59
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Sustainability / continuity
67 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 50
Equity & inclusion
33 · 52
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 37
Inclusiveness / equity
17 · 42
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 28
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 76
Efficiency
0 · 44
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 50

Coloured bar: Barbados. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

National Digital Skills Empowerment Campaign (NTI) · 92

Joint SDG Fund Programme for Gender-Responsive Population Data (Barbados) · 70

Barbados Welcome Stamp · 62

Barbados Welcome Stamp — a Pioneer 12-Month Remote-Work Visa · 57

Standards and Guidelines for the Use of AI in Assessment — Caribbean Examinations Council's Region-Wide AI Policy for CSEC, CAPE and CCSLC · 53

AI Pair-Programming to Rebuild Barbados's Government Website · 47

CXC's AI-Analysed Diagnostic Literacy & Numeracy System for Caribbean Secondary Schools · 27

Barbados Blue Bond Debt Conversion for Marine Conservation · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Barbados concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more