evidoria

What works in Slovakia

All catalogues

34
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 29 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Slovakia

Slovakia faces significant gender equality challenges, with the Eurostat Gender-Equality Index identifying it as the only EU country where gender equality deteriorated between 2008–2018. These challenges are particularly acute in eastern Slovakia, where higher unemployment is linked to alcohol abuse and physical abuse, including violence towards women. To address these issues, Slovakia has implemented multiple educational and awareness initiatives—including school-based prevention activities and infotainment campaigns, programs targeting Roma communities, and leadership development through professional women's networks—though the available evidence is descriptive and self-reported rather than quantifying outcomes.

Drawn from: Soroptimist · Gender equality for Roma communities · Various ways to equality · Slovak National Centre for Human Rights · Women's rights are human rights · Women on boards of top companies in Slovakia · Slovakia's First Web-Accessibility Monitoring Cycle: 30% Perceivable, 34% Robust · Gender Equality Plan SAS (PRR SAV)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +54 pts 86 here · 32 average

Effectiveness +26 pts 92 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality +22 pts 92 here · 70 average

Transferability / replicability +20 pts 80 here · 60 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +15 pts 53 here · 38 average

Evaluated outcomes +14 pts 92 here · 78 average

Sustainability +13 pts 90 here · 78 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 83 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -10 pts 17 here · 27 average

Innovation level -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Demonstrated reach -16 pts 60 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evaluation evidence -29 pts 20 here · 49 average

Curator validation -31 pts 42 here · 73 average

Documented learning -54 pts 20 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
86 · 32
Effectiveness
92 · 66
Impact on gender equality
92 · 70
Transferability / replicability
80 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
53 · 38
Evaluated outcomes
92 · 78
Sustainability
90 · 78
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 74
Scalability beyond pilot
70 · 62
Achievement / evidence
92 · 87
Evidence of impact / measured public value
61 · 57
Equity & inclusion
53 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
27 · 26
Transparency, ethics & data protection
47 · 47
Inclusiveness / equity
42 · 43
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 27
Innovation level
50 · 62
Governance, capability & sustainability
50 · 64
Demonstrated reach
60 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evaluation evidence
20 · 49
Curator validation
42 · 73
Documented learning
20 · 74

Coloured bar: Slovakia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Soroptimist · 98

Gender equality for Roma communities · 89

Various ways to equality · 89

Slovak National Centre for Human Rights · 89

Women's rights are human rights · 89

Slovakia's First Web-Accessibility Monitoring Cycle: 30% Perceivable, 34% Robust · 88

Gender Equality Plan SAS (PRR SAV) · 85

Košice IT Valley — Eastern Slovakia's University-Industry ICT Cluster · 71

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Slovakia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more