evidoria

What works in Slovakia

All catalogues

28
evaluated practices
68/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 27 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Slovakia

Slovakia faces significant gender-equality challenges, with Eurostat data showing that between 2008–2018, Slovakia was the only EU country where gender equality had deteriorated. The country has implemented multiple interventions to address this, including educational awareness campaigns in schools, targeted initiatives for marginalized Roma communities, and professional networks of women working on community empowerment. The Slovak National Centre for Human Rights serves as the designated national equality body conducting research and monitoring compliance with equal-treatment principles. However, the available evidence consists primarily of self-reported program descriptions rather than independent outcome evaluations, so the effectiveness of these initiatives in reversing gender-equality trends remains unquantified.

Drawn from: Soroptimist · Gender equality for Roma communities · Various ways to equality · Slovak National Centre for Human Rights · Women's rights are human rights · Women on boards of top companies in Slovakia · Slovakia's First Web-Accessibility Monitoring Cycle: 30% Perceivable, 34% Robust · Gender Equality Plan SAS (PRR SAV)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Inclusiveness / equity +25 pts 67 here · 42 average

Transferability / replicability +23 pts 82 here · 59 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 37 average

Sustainability +18 pts 96 here · 78 average

Scalability beyond pilot +17 pts 81 here · 64 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -10 pts 53 here · 63 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 17 here · 31 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Evaluation evidence -20 pts 25 here · 45 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Curator validation -26 pts 48 here · 74 average

Documented learning -49 pts 25 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 42
Transferability / replicability
82 · 59
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 37
Sustainability
96 · 78
Scalability beyond pilot
81 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
83 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured public value
58 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
44 · 48
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Innovation level
53 · 63
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 31
Governance, capability & sustainability
50 · 64
Evaluation evidence
25 · 45
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76
Curator validation
48 · 74
Documented learning
25 · 74

Coloured bar: Slovakia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Soroptimist · 98

Gender equality for Roma communities · 89

Various ways to equality · 89

Slovak National Centre for Human Rights · 89

Women's rights are human rights · 89

Slovakia's First Web-Accessibility Monitoring Cycle: 30% Perceivable, 34% Robust · 88

Gender Equality Plan SAS (PRR SAV) · 85

Košice IT Valley — Eastern Slovakia's University-Industry ICT Cluster · 71

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Slovakia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more