evidoria

What works in Bratislava

All catalogues · Slovakia profile

15
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 15 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Bratislava

The Soroptimist Club of Bratislava is a local chapter of professional women engaged in improving women's lives in the city, focusing on empowerment, education, and capacity-building for girls and women in leadership roles, and participating in a global project-matching network with other clubs like Žilina. The practice is presented as producing good results, though the source material does not report independent evaluation of outcomes.

Drawn from: Soroptimist · Gender equality for Roma communities · Gender Equality Plan SAS (PRR SAV) · Výbor pre rodovú rovnosť - Committee for Gender Equality Slovakia · Gender Equality / Rodová Rovnosť · Gender Equality: The New Agenda of the „old“ Social Partners? · Creative Voucher Scheme — Slovakia's Innovation Vouchers for Creative-Sector SMEs · Aj Ty v IT — Slovakia's Girls-in-IT Nonprofit Adds AI to Its National Coding Curriculum

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Equity & inclusion +29 pts 83 here · 54 average

Inclusiveness / equity +26 pts 67 here · 41 average

Transferability / replicability +20 pts 79 here · 59 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Sustainability +13 pts 93 here · 80 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +11 pts 50 here · 39 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Scalability beyond pilot +9 pts 75 here · 66 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -11 pts 56 here · 66 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Evidence of learning impact -13 pts 17 here · 30 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -18 pts 17 here · 35 average

Curator validation -20 pts 55 here · 75 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Demonstrated reach -42 pts 33 here · 75 average

Documented learning -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 52
Equity & inclusion
83 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 41
Transferability / replicability
79 · 59
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Sustainability
93 · 80
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 39
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Scalability beyond pilot
75 · 66
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Innovation level
62 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 53
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 66
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 78
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 30
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 35
Curator validation
55 · 75
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Demonstrated reach
33 · 75
Documented learning
0 · 73

Coloured bar: Bratislava. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Soroptimist · 98

Gender equality for Roma communities · 89

Gender Equality Plan SAS (PRR SAV) · 85

Creative Voucher Scheme — Slovakia's Innovation Vouchers for Creative-Sector SMEs · 62

Aj Ty v IT — Slovakia's Girls-in-IT Nonprofit Adds AI to Its National Coding Curriculum · 60

IT Fitness Test · 52

Slovakia's National Plan for the Responsible Use of AI in Education (2025–2027) · 47

Slovakia's Agri-Environment-Climate Measure (AEKO) — CAP Strategic Plan 2023–2027 · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more