evidoria

What works in Eswatini

All catalogues

8
evaluated practices
41/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Eswatini

Eswatini has pursued multiple digital inclusion and social protection initiatives over the past several years. Eswatini's Universal Access Fund has distributed over 14,000 subsidised smartphones and assistive devices to elderly people and people with disabilities, though internet usage remains at only about 58% of the population despite 95% 4G coverage, indicating a persistent affordability gap. The country's gender-based violence response organization SWAGAA recorded 1,172 GBV cases between January and May 2024, with roughly 85% occurring in domestic settings. More recently, Eswatini launched a pilot digital academy in July 2026 to train 50 women in AI, cybersecurity, and data science, though no outcome data yet exists from this nascent programme.

Drawn from: Universal Access Fund: Smartphones & Assistive Technology for Vulnerable Citizens · SWAGAA: Three Decades of Survivor-Centred Response to Gender-Based Violence in Eswatini · She Powers Africa Digital Academy — Eswatini's UAE-Backed AI, Cybersecurity and Data-Science Pilot · Royal Science and Technology Park — Eswatini's Legislated Innovation and Biotech Zone · SNPAS OECM Grants — Eswatini's National Payment Scheme for Community & Private Conservation Land · Nomfundo AI — Schools Online Foundation's AI Teaching Assistant in Eswatini Schools · Nomfundo AI — Eswatini Pilots an AI Teaching-Assistant Chatbot in Three Schools Amid Teacher-Union Pushback

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Governance, certification & transferability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Sustainability +10 pts 89 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Equity & inclusion -11 pts 42 here · 52 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Innovation level -16 pts 47 here · 63 average

Scalability & sustainability -17 pts 47 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -20 pts 8 here · 28 average

Transferability / replicability -26 pts 33 here · 60 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -59 pts 0 here · 59 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Curator validation -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes -85 pts 0 here · 85 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 64
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 51
Sustainability
89 · 78
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Equity & inclusion
42 · 52
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Innovation level
47 · 63
Scalability & sustainability
47 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
8 · 28
Transferability / replicability
33 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 76
Efficiency
0 · 44
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured results
0 · 59
Documented learning
0 · 74
Curator validation
0 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 85

Coloured bar: Eswatini. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Universal Access Fund: Smartphones & Assistive Technology for Vulnerable Citizens · 72

SWAGAA: Three Decades of Survivor-Centred Response to Gender-Based Violence in Eswatini · 59

She Powers Africa Digital Academy — Eswatini's UAE-Backed AI, Cybersecurity and Data-Science Pilot · 47

UNESWA AI Academy — University of Eswatini Certifies Educators in Generative AI · 40

Royal Science and Technology Park — Eswatini's Legislated Innovation and Biotech Zone · 33

SNPAS OECM Grants — Eswatini's National Payment Scheme for Community & Private Conservation Land · 33

Nomfundo AI — Schools Online Foundation's AI Teaching Assistant in Eswatini Schools · 27

Nomfundo AI — Eswatini Pilots an AI Teaching-Assistant Chatbot in Three Schools Amid Teacher-Union Pushback · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Eswatini concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more