evidoria

What works in Venezuela

All catalogues

7
evaluated practices
39/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Venezuela

Venezuela's digital inclusion efforts have expanded significantly: Fundación Infocentro's network grew to over 740 community technology-access centres and 244 robotics-education nuclei by 2025, though independent evaluation found these eased social inclusion without necessarily building lasting technological literacy. Forty percent of primary teachers already use AI tools like ChatGPT in pedagogical practice, with a sharp generational divide (80% of younger teachers vs. 54% of over-65s aware of AI), yet this remains an exploratory phase rather than a scaled, learning-outcomes-evaluated one. Gender parity regulations issued by the CNE since 2020 have been largely ineffective, with only 3 of 26 parties meeting 2020 criteria and women winning just 33.57% of Assembly seats, and no parity rules published for the 2025 elections. The Carnet de la Patria biometric ID system, built with Chinese technical assistance, links citizens' health, residential, social media and political data in centralised databases used to monitor voting behaviour.

Drawn from: Fundación Infocentro – National Network of Community Technology Access Centres · CNE Gender Parity & Alternation Regulation for Candidate Lists · Fundación Telefónica's First National Study Finds 4 in 10 Venezuelan Teachers Already Using AI · Carnet de la Patria — Venezuela's Biometric ID Tying Subsidies to Political Surveillance · UCABee — Generative-AI Administrative Chatbot at Venezuela's Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Equity & inclusion -19 pts 33 here · 52 average

Scalability & sustainability -22 pts 42 here · 64 average

Innovation level -23 pts 40 here · 63 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Transferability / replicability -26 pts 33 here · 60 average

Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -37 pts 17 here · 54 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -53 pts 11 here · 64 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -90 pts 0 here · 90 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 50
Equity & inclusion
33 · 52
Scalability & sustainability
42 · 64
Innovation level
40 · 63
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 59
Transferability / replicability
33 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 28
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Transparency, fairness & accountability
17 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 44
Governance, capability & sustainability
11 · 64
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Achievement / evidence
0 · 90

Coloured bar: Venezuela. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Fundación Infocentro – National Network of Community Technology Access Centres · 88

CNE Gender Parity & Alternation Regulation for Candidate Lists · 48

Mincyt's AI Damage-Mapping Tool — Venezuela Fuses Multimodal Models With Before/After Satellite Imagery After the June 2026 La Guaira Earthquakes · 33

Fundación Telefónica's First National Study Finds 4 in 10 Venezuelan Teachers Already Using AI · 33

Carnet de la Patria — Venezuela's Biometric ID Tying Subsidies to Political Surveillance · 27

UCABee — Generative-AI Administrative Chatbot at Venezuela's Universidad Católica Andrés Bello · 27

Canaima National Park & the Caroní Watershed — A Hydropower Lifeline Undermined by Illegal Gold Mining · 13

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Venezuela concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more