evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Astana Hub — Kazakhstan's Tax-Free Technopark for Scaling Tech Companies

Kazakhstan · Astana · See the Kazakhstan profile · See the Astana profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 54% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Kazakhstan's state-run technopark grants resident IT firms 10-year tax exemptions and simplified visas; residents grew past 1,600 companies in 2024, with tech exports reaching $633.8M and 32,000+ jobs by end of 2025.

1,600+
Resident companies (end of 2024)
633.8 $M
IT-service exports (end of 2025)
32,000+
Cumulative jobs (end of 2025)
~28.9 $M
State investment (first five years)
Astana Hub — Kazakhstan's Tax-Free Technopark for Scaling Tech Companies

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Astana Hub (Government of Kazakhstan)
Period
2018–present
Keywords
IT services, tech entrepreneurship, special economic zone, export promotion

Context

Astana Hub is Kazakhstan's national 'international technopark of IT start-ups', created by Government Resolution No. 644 and officially opened on 6 November 2018. Resident companies receive a package of state incentives: a ten-year corporate-tax exemption, simplified work-visa rules for foreign specialists, and access to acceleration, incubation and export-promotion services.

Activities

The technopark admits IT companies as residents and provides tax and visa incentives alongside acceleration and export-promotion support intended to grow them from early-stage ventures into exporters.

Results

Resident companies rose from roughly 1,100 to over 1,600 by the end of 2024 (500+ new joiners that year, including 425+ with foreign participation), while tech-sector revenue reached $1.3 billion, IT-service exports hit $481.5 million and residents attracted $177 million in investment. By the end of 2025, resident revenue exceeded $1.7 billion, exports reached $633.8 million to 111 countries, and cumulative jobs passed 32,000. Over its first five years the state invested roughly 15 billion tenge (~$28.9 million) against tech-industry revenues it credits at 1.5 trillion tenge (~$2.9 billion).

Conclusions

The growth trajectory is well documented across multiple outlets, but the model depends on continued state tax subsidy -- a sustainability question the available sources do not address -- and no source discloses how benefits are distributed by region, company size or founder demographics.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — State investment of roughly 15 billion tenge (~$28.9 million) over the technopark's first five years, funding the tax-exemption regime, acceleration and export-promotion services.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Opened 6 November 2018; ten-year resident tax exemptions running on a rolling basis; growth reporting available through end of 2025.
Staffing & skills
Astana Hub management (state technopark administration), Government of Kazakhstan (policy and tax-incentive design)

Conditions for success

  • Statutory tax holiday (ten-year corporate-tax exemption) and simplified visa rules to attract resident IT firms and foreign specialists
  • Sustained multi-year state capital commitment to acceleration, incubation and export-promotion services
  • An explicit export-promotion mandate connecting residents to international markets

Common failure modes

  • Growth model relies on continued state tax subsidy; no source assesses fiscal sustainability once exemptions expire for early cohorts
  • No independent audit of self-reported revenue, export or job figures was found
  • No regional, firm-size or founder-demographic breakdown, so equity of access within Kazakhstan is unevidenced

Where it fits

Governance type
national government / state technopark
Scale
national (Kazakhstan)
Income level
upper-middle-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful