evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Begripsam — Co-Researchers with Cognitive Disabilities Redesign Sweden's National eHealth Service

Sweden · Stockholm · See the Sweden profile · See the Stockholm profile

Top 39% 76/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

41 co-researchers with cognitive disabilities, working with KTH Royal Institute of Technology, redesigned a prototype of Sweden's national 1177 eHealth service; published in the International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, December 2025.

Begripsam — Co-Researchers with Cognitive Disabilities Redesign Sweden's National eHealth Service

Details

Promoter
Begripsam, with KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Funktionsrätt Skåne
Period
2025 (study published); organisation ongoing
Keywords
cognitive accessibility, eHealth, co-design, disability inclusion

Description

Begripsam is a Stockholm-based association and company whose members have lived experience of cognitive disabilities arising from diagnoses such as intellectual disability, acquired brain injury or long-term illness. It works with researchers and public bodies to test and redesign digital services for cognitive accessibility.
Between the group and Funktionsrätt Skåne, 41 people with cognitive impairments (26 women, 15 men, aged 20–75) took part as co-researchers, alongside Stefan Johansson of KTH Royal Institute of Technology's Media Technology and Interaction Design group, in a three-step 'Participatory Research through Design' process to evaluate and redesign a prototype based on 1177, Sweden's national public eHealth service.
The collaboration produced a high-fidelity redesigned prototype and was published as peer-reviewed research in the International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction in December 2025. The redesign has been evaluated with co-researchers but has not yet been adopted into the live 1177 service, so its population-level impact is not yet demonstrated.

Read the full analysis: https://www.begripsam.se/english

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful