evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Canada Digital Adoption Program (CDAP) — Grants, Loans and an Early Cancellation

Canada · Ottawa · See the Canada profile · See the Ottawa profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 97% 38/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Canada's federal government ran a CAD 4 billion digital-adoption programme with e-commerce micro-grants, advisory grants up to CAD 15,000 and BDC loans; over 88,000 SMEs received grants, but it was cancelled two years early after criticism of its rigid, consultant-heavy design.

CAD 4 billion
Total programme envelope
20,000+ (CAD 47.8 million)
Grow stream grants approved
15,000+ (CAD 229 million+)
Boost stream grant claims disbursed
~5,000 (CAD 280 million+, 82% approval rate)
BDC loans authorised
88,000+
Total SME grant recipients (combined streams)

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED)
Period
2022–2024
Keywords
SME digitalisation, e-commerce grants, digital advisory services, business loans

Context

Modelled on Toronto's 2014 'Digital Main Street' initiative, Canada's federal government created the Canada Digital Adoption Program (CDAP) as a CAD 4 billion envelope to help small and medium businesses adopt digital technology (CAD 1.4 billion in grants and advisory services, up to CAD 2.6 billion in loans).

Objectives

Help Canadian SMEs adopt e-commerce and digital technologies through micro-grants, subsidised digital-plan advisory services, and low-interest loans.

Activities

'Grow Your Business Online' offered e-commerce micro-grants up to CAD 2,400; 'Boost Your Business Technology' offered advisory grants covering up to 90% of a digital-plan consultant's fee, capped at CAD 15,000, plus zero-interest Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) loans up to CAD 100,000, delivered through 15 regional service providers and a marketplace of more than 700 advisory firms.

Results

By closure, the Grow stream had received over 43,000 applications and approved more than 20,000 grants worth an estimated CAD 47.8 million; the Boost stream had given over 53,000 SMEs a digital-needs assessment and disbursed more than 15,000 grant claims worth over CAD 229 million; BDC authorised nearly 5,000 loans worth over CAD 280 million, approving 82% of loan applications. Despite this reach, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada wound the programme down by September 2024, about two years ahead of schedule, having spent well under its CAD 4 billion envelope.

Conclusions

Independent policy analysis (Policy Options/IRPP) attributed the shortfall to a cumbersome, jargon-heavy application process, a rigid one-size-fits-all advisory template regardless of business size, and a fee structure that drew 'questionably credentialed' consultants into the marketplace rather than sustaining follow-through by SMEs — and noted government was aware of these problems roughly a year before it acted.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) for loans, 15 regional service providers (Grow stream), 700+ marketplace advisory firms (Boost stream)

Conditions for success

  • Modelled on and scaled up from Toronto's pre-existing Digital Main Street programme
  • Multi-channel delivery combining micro-grants, subsidised advisory services and low-interest loans

Common failure modes

  • Cumbersome, jargon-heavy application process (Policy Options/IRPP)
  • Rigid one-size-fits-all advisory template regardless of business size
  • Fee structure attracted 'questionably credentialed' consultants rather than sustaining SME follow-through
  • Government reportedly aware of these design problems roughly a year before cancelling the programme

Where it fits

Governance type
national government programme (federal ministry plus arm's-length development bank)
Scale
national (Canada-wide SME support)
Income level
high-income (Canada)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful