evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

CNIPES National Diagnosis of AI in Portuguese Higher Education — A 68-Institution Survey Proposing 'Know, Do, Be Without AI'

Portugal · Lisbon · See the Portugal profile · See the Lisbon profile

Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Portugal's CNIPES working group surveyed 68 higher-education institutions: AI is already used in teaching at 52.9%, research 42.6% and management 26.5%, but governance lags adoption. It proposes three pillars: know about, do with, and be without AI.

CNIPES National Diagnosis of AI in Portuguese Higher Education — A 68-Institution Survey Proposing 'Know, Do, Be Without AI'

Details

Promoter
CNIPES (Conselho Nacional para a Inovação Pedagógica no Ensino Superior) / DGES
Period
2025-2026
Keywords
higher education, AI governance, institutional policy, diagnosis

Description

In April 2026 the Portuguese Council for Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education (CNIPES), through a Digital and AI in Education working group created by Despacho n.º 10945/2025, published through DGES the first comprehensive national diagnosis of AI in higher education.
The findings draw on responses from 68 institutions plus a review of international, governmental and university strategies. Existing AI use is reported by 52.9% of institutions in teaching, 42.6% in research and 26.5% in management. The central conclusion is that adoption has outpaced institutional capacity to set clear, consistent and comparable rules; many institutions still lack explicit usage rules.
The report proposes three pillars for institutional integration: 'Saber sobre IA' (conceptual, ethical and epistemic literacy), 'Fazer com IA' (pedagogical and creative uses) and 'Ser sem IA' (preserving autonomy and critical judgement, including recognising when to limit or decline AI). It calls for human mediation and fact-checking of AI outputs as the starting point of governance.
Limits: this is a self-reported institutional survey. The public summaries do not state response rate or method detail, and no learning outcomes are measured, so the evidence supports its value as a governance baseline rather than proof of impact.

Read the full analysis: https://dges.gov.pt/pt/content/inteligencia-artificial-no-ensino-superior-em-portugal-diagnostico-nacional-para-governacao

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful