Canada's Federal AI Register — 409 Systems Disclosed, but Only 4% With Public Impact Assessments
Canada
On 28 November 2025 Canada published its first federal AI Register, listing 409 systems across 42 institutions. An independent review …
France · Paris · See the France profile · See the Paris profile
Top 88% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
France's 2016 law requiring agencies to disclose algorithmic decision rules has gone almost entirely unenforced, the Ombudsman found in Nov 2024, naming only three compliant bodies. Researchers built an independent observatory since regulators had not.
Since 2016, France's Digital Republic Act (Article L. 312-1-3 of the Code des relations entre le public et l'administration) has required public bodies of a certain size to publish online the rules governing the algorithms they use to make individual decisions. In a report published on 13 November 2024, the Défenseure des droits (France's independent Ombudsman) concluded that the obligation "has remained a dead letter since 2016", naming only three bodies known to comply: the national employment agency France Travail, and the departmental councils of Ille-et-Vilaine and Val-d'Oise.
The Ombudsman's report found that even where administrations do publish information, it is frequently incomplete or hard to locate, and recommended that the government introduce financial penalties for non-compliance and publish a public list of which administrations do and do not comply — neither of which existed as of the report's publication.
In the absence of active enforcement, three independent researchers — sociologist Camille Girard-Chanudet, designer Estelle Hary, and AI/human-rights researcher Soizic Pénicaud — launched the Observatoire des algorithmes publics (ODAP) in November 2024 to compile, outside government channels, an inventory of the algorithms central administrations and state agencies actually use. As of its launch, ODAP explicitly excluded local authorities and hospitals for lack of accessible source data.
This practice is included as a cautionary, evidence-based case rather than a success story: it documents, with an official Ombudsman finding, what happens when an algorithm-transparency mandate carries no enforcement mechanism — and shows civil-society researchers stepping in to do the disclosure work the law itself has not produced in eight years.
Read the full analysis: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/algorithmes-intelligence-artificielle-et-services-publics-2024
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Canada
On 28 November 2025 Canada published its first federal AI Register, listing 409 systems across 42 institutions. An independent review …
Spain
In January 2025 the Basque Government launched a public catalogue disclosing the purpose, data and human-oversight status of the AI …
United Kingdom
The UK's Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard requires central government bodies to publish structured records of algorithmic tools that significantly influence …
United States of America
Under OMB Memo M-24-10, US federal agencies (except DOD and intelligence) must inventory their AI use cases yearly and publish …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.