Top 80%
in this catalogue (797 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Transferability / replicability1/3
Adapted from a UK-originated CBT/Duluth-informed model into the Swedish correctional system, but the transfer did not replicate positive outcomes and was later discontinued.
Impact on gender equality0/1
The matched-comparison evaluation found no meaningful difference in reoffending between treated and untreated offenders (25% vs 23%).
Effectiveness0/1
A quasi-experimental comparison of 340 IDAP participants against 452 matched offenders found the programme did not significantly reduce violent reoffending.
Efficiency0/1
No positive cost-effectiveness evidence was found, and the programme was discontinued rather than sustained, indicating a poor evidence-to-resource case.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
Outcomes were rigorously tracked through a large matched-comparison study (n=792) commissioned by the delivering agency itself.
Sustainability0/1
Kriminalvården phased the programme out from around 2020 after 16 years of operation, so it was not sustained long-term.
Achievement / evidence0/1
The completer-vs-dropout gap (18% vs 42% reoffending) reflects selection effects among motivated offenders rather than a demonstrated programme effect.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1
The programme was explicitly designed to address male perpetrators of intimate-partner violence within the criminal justice system.
Curator validation1/1
The result is corroborated both by the delivering agency's own published evaluation and an independent peer-reviewed academic critique.
Evidoria. IDAP (Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme) — Sweden's Discontinued Prison and Probation Perpetrator Programme. Persistent ID: b32bda54-e146-40ce-a26b-0783ec8bae16.