evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

NATO StratCom COE Opens an AI Lab in Riga to Harden Allies Against Disinformation

Latvia · Riga · See the Latvia profile · See the Riga profile

Top 75% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Latvia-hosted NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence is standing up a dedicated AI Lab, funded to €5.54m in 2026 and €5.66m annually from 2027, to build election-security and disinformation-detection capability for NATO members and partners.

Details

Promoter
NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (StratCom COE)
Period
2025–present (AI Lab)
Keywords
defence, strategic communications, disinformation resilience, election security

Description

The NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence, based in Riga and operating since 2014, is launching a dedicated AI Lab tasked with improving election security and resilience against disinformation and adversarial manipulation, and with building predictive, decision-support tools for policymakers facing information threats.

The Lab is funded through reallocation of national Ministry of Defence budgets: funding rises by €1.08 million in 2026 to reach €5.54 million, and by a further €897,640 from 2027 onward, bringing the annual total to €5.66 million. The Centre began recruiting for multiple AI Lab roles as the programme stood up.

As an accredited NATO Centre of Excellence — not a NATO command — its findings and tools are designed to be shared across member states and partner countries. Because the Lab has only just been funded and staffed, there is not yet public evidence of its detection tools being independently evaluated or deployed operationally.

Read the full analysis: https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/ai-and-advanced-tech/nato-strategic-communications-centre-of-excellence-launches-new-ai-laboratory/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful