Top 63%
neste catálogo (1071 práticas pontuadas)
As pontuações concentram-se em valores altos, pelo que a posição dentro do catálogo é muitas vezes mais reveladora do que o número isolado.
Evidence of impact / measured results2/3
A Scottish Government-commissioned evaluation (Glasgow Caledonian University, fieldwork 2016-2018) assessed impacts on communities, services, democracy and inequalities, though its interim report found limited demonstrable impact on local services.
Transferability / demonstrated replication2/3
The national framework gives other councils a documented route to adopt PB, and the evaluation reviews how authorities approach the 1% target.
Scalability2/3
57,000 people took part in government-supported PB in 2017-18 and the target is 1% of council budgets by 2021, but moving from ~£10,000 area allocations to larger sums is a major institutional shift.
Sustainability / continuity2/3
A COSLA-Scottish Government framework agreement and a dedicated fund (£1.5m, 91 applications in 2017-18) support continuity beyond pilots.
Innovation1/3
The model itself is borrowed from earlier PB practice; the novelty is a national mainstreaming target.
Inclusiveness / equity2/3
The evaluation explicitly examined tackling inequalities, though the interim report did not demonstrate service-level change.
Multi-stakeholder collaboration2/3
Public bodies, community organisations, COSLA and the Scottish Government jointly funded and delivered PB processes.
Evidoria. Community Choices da Escócia — Programa nacional de orçamento participativo e meta de 1 % no orçamento corrente, avaliado em 2016–2018. ID persistente: be3eec9e-faa2-4fd7-836f-0827e7891845.