|
VIGINUM's D3lta — France's Open-Source AI Tool for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation |
Evidence: Observational / pre–post
|
Top 1% 93/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
Foncier Innovant — France's AI detection of undeclared property |
Evidence: Observational / pre–post
|
Top 12% 80/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
ChatFT and Match FT — France Travail's AI Tools for Jobseeker Matching and Advisor Support |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 22% 73/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
CNIL's AI Sandbox for Public Services — Piloting Guardrails for Government AI Before Deployment |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 22% 73/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
Grand Débat National — France's AI-Assisted Analysis of 2 Million Citizen Contributions |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 32% 67/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
LLaMandement — France's AI Tool for Processing Parliamentary Budget Amendments |
Evidence: Observational / pre–post
|
Top 32% 67/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
ANSM's AI-Assisted Pharmacovigilance — France's Machine-Learning Pre-Coding of COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse-Event Reports |
Not assessed |
Top 46% 60/100 |
Good practice |
Saint-Denis, France |
— |
|
GPT@EC at the European Ombudsman — Guardrailed Generative AI for Case-Handling Support |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 46% 60/100 |
Good practice |
Strasbourg, France |
— |
|
Antibes Juan-les-Pins' Algorithm Inventory — A Mid-Sized French City's Six-Monthly Register Under the Lemaire Law |
Not assessed |
Top 62% 53/100 |
Good practice |
Antibes, France |
— |
|
Parcoursup's Local Algorithms — France's Constitutional Council Orders Post-Hoc Publication of University Selection Criteria |
Not assessed |
Top 62% 53/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
Nantes Métropole's Public Algorithm Registry — France's First Open-Sourced Municipal Algorithms |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 62% 53/100 |
Good practice |
Nantes, France |
— |
|
Albert API — France's sovereign generative-AI platform for civil servants |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 62% 53/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
data.gouv.fr's MCP Server — Connecting AI Assistants to France's Full Open-Data Catalogue |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 74% 47/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
data.gouv.fr's Albert-Powered AI Metadata Enrichment and Natural-Language Catalogue Access |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 74% 47/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
Observatoire des Algorithmes Publics (ODAP) — France's Citizen-Led Public Algorithm Inventory |
Evidence: Observational / pre–post
|
Top 74% 47/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
Ille-et-Vilaine's Register of Algorithmic Processing — 91 Departmental Algorithms Published After a Civil-Society Complaint |
Not assessed |
Top 83% 40/100 |
Good practice |
Rennes, France |
— |
|
Ille-et-Vilaine's Inventory of Algorithmic Treatments — a French Département Publishes 91 Algorithms, Without Source Code |
Not assessed |
Top 83% 40/100 |
Good practice |
Rennes, France |
— |
|
Observatoire des Algorithmes Publics — a Citizen-Led Monitor Exposing France's Unenforced 2016 Transparency Law |
Evidence: Observational / pre–post
|
Top 83% 40/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
France Travail's Job-Search Control Targeting Model — 26 Variables, 7,000-File Pilots and an Unpublished Evaluation |
Not assessed |
Top 89% 33/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
France's Public-Algorithm Transparency Law — "A Dead Letter Since 2016", per the Ombudsman |
Evidence: Observational / pre–post
|
Top 89% 33/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
France Travail's 'Ciblage du Contrôle' — an AI Tool Sorting Job Seekers into 'Suspect' and 'Non-Suspect' for Control Priority |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 89% 33/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
data.gouv.fr MCP Server — France's Experimental Generative-AI Gateway to Public Datasets |
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported
|
Top 89% 33/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |
|
CNAF's Algorithme de Notation — France's Decade-Old Welfare Risk-Score Facing a 25-Organisation Legal Challenge |
Not assessed |
Top 100% 13/100 |
Good practice |
Paris, France |
— |